Costs of Resistance in Plants: From Theory to Evidence
Abstract
Plants defend themselves against attack by herbivores with a variety of physical and chemical defences, some of which also work by recruiting partners from the third trophic level. Despite the known or potential benefits of possessing defence traits, the expression of defence traits varies among tissues within individual plants, within and among plant populations, and across biotic and abiotic environments. The central explanation for such variation is that the expression of defence traits is costly to fitness in the absence of benefits. Here, we review how cost‐benefit trade‐offs have been incorporated in several hypotheses about the ecology and evolution of plant defences. We then describe several approaches that have been used to examine costs, and the empirical evidence that has been attained through their use. After 30 years of study, a consensus has emerged through a variety of approaches that expression of defence traits is, indeed, costly, but that the magnitude and importance of costs are context‐dependent.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 184 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Cipollini, D., Walters, D., & Voelckel, C.
- Affiliations
- Wright State University (US)
- Scottish Agricultural College (GB)
- Massey University (NZ)
- ORCID
- Walters, Dale
- Venue
- Annual Plant Reviews online
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-07-17
- Pages
- 263-307
- OpenAlex
- W3021350277
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 184
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 19 · 2015: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Plant Reviews online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Keywords
- fitness cost of resistance, plant defense, cost-benefit trade-off, herbivore resistance, plant-herbivore interactions, chemical defense, induced defense, plant fitness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review