Materials Science and Technology of Optical Fabrication
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Various tool types have been developed including multilayer elastic tools, viscoelastic tools (like Newtonian fluids), semi-flexible tools (e.g. thin metal layer), viscoplastic (pitch) tools, and mechanically driven tools.
“Various tool types have been developed including multilayer elastic tools, viscoelastic tools (like Newtonian fluids) [18, 30, 31], semi-flexible tools (e.g. thin metal layer) [17, 19, 20], viscoplastic (pitch) tools [19, 27, 28, 32], and mechanically driven tools[33].”
From Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
The Organization (p. 4) lists viscoelastic/viscoplastic lap response, supporting the existence of viscoplastic polishing laps. The Organization (p. 6) separately lists pitch button blocking, but our copy does not identify pitch as a viscoplastic polishing tool; that example is not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe general approach to minimizing MSF errors in the final workpiece during fabrication is to develop processes that minimize the creation of MSF errors during surface figure correction and/or to reduce MSF errors post surface figure correction using a smoothing polishing process.
“The general approach to minimizing MRF errors in the final workpiece during fabrication is to: 1) develop processes that minimize the creation of MSF errors during surface figure correction (such as optimized rastering patterns[12-14], tool size selection, and tool process parameters[15, 16]); and/or 2) reduce MSF errors post surface figure correction using a smoothing polishing process[17-20].”
From Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [1]1. H. Karow, Fabrication Methods for Precision Optics Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience, 2004.
- [3]3. M. Bass, et. al. Handbook of Optics, Third Edition Volume II: Design, Fabrication and Testing, Sources and Detectors, Radiometry and Photometry McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York, NY, USA (2010).
- [4]4. J. Schwiegerling Optical Specification, Fabrication, and Testing (SPIE Press Monograph PM252) First Edition (2014).
- [5]5. F. Twyman, Prism and Lens Making: A textbook for optical glassworkers Hilger & Watts, Hilger Division; 2nd edition (1952).
- [7]7. A. DeVany, Master Optical Techniques (Wiley Series in Pure and Applied Optics) (1981).
- [8]8. D. Malacara, Optical Shop Testing, 3 rd Edition Wiley-Interscience A John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2007).
- [10]10. L. Cook, ' Chemical processes in glass polishing' Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 120(1-3) (1990) 152-171. 2006 - 2009 Technology
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing
Suratwala, T., Tham, G., Steele, R., Wong, L., Menapace, J., Ray, N., & Bauman, B. (2023) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.482739 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Suratwala, T. I.
- Affiliations
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Suratwala, Tayyab I.
- ORCID
- Suratwala, Tayyab I.
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-08-06
- OpenAlex
- W2887405115
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.osti.gov
- Locations
- Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced optical system design
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Glass properties and applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Optical Coatings and Gratings
- Keywords
- optical fabrication, optical materials, materials science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
