The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Manipulation Styles of Abusers who Work with Children
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Demographic Profile and Offending Patterns of Professional Perpetrators Psychometric Comparisons with Intra- and Extra-Familial Child Abusers Rationale for a Qualitative Methodology Motivation to Sexually Offend Victim Selection, Grooming and Abuse Manipulation Styles Conclusions Multi Disciplinary Issues Future Directions References
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The existing literature consistently describes individuals who engage in OSG, and TA-CSA more broadly, as a heterogenous group, using a wide range of strategies from flattery, gifts, and praise, to threats, intimidation, and blackmail (Campbell, 2009; Kloess etal., 2019; Sullivan & Quayle, 2012).”
From Unraveling the Complexities of Offender Strategies as Part of Online Sexual Grooming and Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Sullivan & Quayle, 2012
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.1177/0957926509106410 · DOI
- Bolton G., 2005, Reflective Practice
- 10.1002/car.1019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.09.011 · DOI
- 10.1177/0306624X07312791 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.avb.2006.09.005 · DOI
- 10.1177/1079063209358106 · DOI
- Held J., 2009, A Serious Case Review of Child Sexual Abuse at Stony Dean School, Buckinghamshire: executive summary report: a chapter 8 report for: Buckinghamshire Safeguarding Children’s Board and Buckinghamshire County Council
- 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00113-7 · DOI
- 10.1177/1077559509360251 · DOI
- Maxwell J.A., 1996, Qualitative Research Design: An interactive approach
- 10.1080/13552600410001667788 · DOI
- Sullivan J., 2010, Comparing intra‐familial and extra‐familial child sexual abusers with professionals who have sexually abused children with whom they work, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1
- 10.1016/S0272-7358(97)81034-3 · DOI
- 10.1177/107906329801000106 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of online grooming: Characteristics and concerns
Whittle, H., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., Beech, A., & Collings, G. (2013) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.09.003 · Cited by 242
“Cause ur special”: Understanding trust and complimenting behaviour in online grooming discourse
Lorenzo-Dus, N., & Izura, C. (2017) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.004 · Cited by 71
Kloess, J. A., Seymour-Smith, S., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E., Long, M. L., Shipley, D., & Beech, A. R. (2017) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063215612442 · Cited by 71
Porcelli, C., Anderson, F., & Kloess, J. A. (2026) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380251411261
Metadata
- Authors
- Sullivan, J., & Quayle, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- ORCID
- Quayle, Ethel
- Venue
- Creating Safer Organisations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-04-10
- Pages
- 85-98
- OpenAlex
- W2549392950
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
- Keywords
- child sexual abuse, child abusers, intrafamilial abuse, extrafamilial abuse, victim selection, grooming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
