Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time‐Frequency Processing

Arfib, D., Keiler, F., Zölzer, U., Verfaille, V., Bonada, J.·2011·DAFX: Digital Audio Effects
DOI 10.1002/9781119991298.ch7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781119991298.ch7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.2307/3680870 · DOI
  2. Blauert J., 1983, Spatial Hearing: the Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization
  3. 10.1109/89.279283 · DOI
  4. Combes J. M., 1989, Wavelets. Time Frequency Methods and Phase Space, 10.1007/978-3-642-97177-8 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/B978-0-12-174584-4.50005-0 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0165-1684(83)90013-0 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/TASSP.1980.1163353 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1109/89.771312 · DOI
  9. [GBA00]A.De Götzen N.Bernadini andD.Arfib.Traditional (?) implementations of a phase vocoder: The tricks of the trade. InProc. DAFX‐00 Conference on Digital Audio Effects pp.37–43 2000.
  10. Laroche J., 1998, Applications of Digital Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, 279
  11. [Lar03]J.Laroche.Frequency‐domain techniques for high quality voice modification. InProc. 6th DAFX‐03 Conf. Digital Audio Effects pp.328–332 2003.
  12. Laroche J., 1999, New phase‐vocoder techniques for real‐time pitch shifting, chorusing, harmonizing, and other exotic audio modifications, J. Audio Eng. Soc., 47, 928
  13. 10.2307/3681275 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/TASSP.1976.1162810 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/78.224251 · DOI
  16. Quatieri T. F., 1998, Applications of Digital Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, 343
  17. [Röb03]A.Röbel.A new approach to transient processing in the phase vocoder. InProc. 6th DAFX‐03 Conf. Digital Audio Effects pp.344–349 2003.
  18. [Röb10]A.Röbel.A shape‐invariant phase vocoder for speech transformation. InProc. 13th DAFX‐10 Conf. Digital Audio Effects pp.298–305 2010.
  19. [SL94]Z.SettelandC.Lippe.Real‐time musical applications using the FFT‐based resynthesis. InProc. Int. Comp. Music Conf. 1994.
  20. 10.1007/978-3-322-92773-6 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0165-1684(90)90087-F · DOI · Paper page
  22. Zölzer U., 2005, Digital Audio Signal Processing

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Arfib, D., Keiler, F., Zölzer, U., Verfaille, V., & Bonada, J.
Venue
DAFX: Digital Audio Effects
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-10
Pages
219-278
DOI
10.1002/9781119991298.ch7
Cited by
3
References
1
Language
en
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.