The DOI matches its Crossref record.
John Bowlby – From Psychoanalysis to Ethology: Unraveling the Roots of Attachment Theory
Abstract
This accessible book draws on unique evidence from oral histories and little-known archive material to shed new light on the working relationships which led to John Bowlby's shift from psychoanalysis to ethology as a frame of reference - and ultimately to the development of attachment theory. A unique exploration of the origins of Bowlby's ideas and the critical transformation in his thinking - offers an alternative to standard accounts of the origin of attachment theory. Explores the significance of Bowlby's influential working relationships with Robert Hinde, Harry Harlow, James Robertson and Mary Ainsworth. Provides students, academics, and practitioners with clear insights into the development of attachment theory. Accessible to general readers interested in psychology and psychoanalysis.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Lorenz portrayed FAPs as highly stereotyped innate movement patterns that would run to completion regardless of further stimulation, thus comprising a concrete rendering of the genetically-programmed core of a species’ typical behavior (Van der Horst, 2011).”
From Back to basics: A re-evaluation of the relevance of imprinting in the genesis of Bowlby’s attachment theory (2022) · cites this paper as Van der Horst, 2011
In the citing paper
“demonstrating that imprinting is a process neither instinctive nor learned (Van der Horst, 2011).”
From Back to basics: A re-evaluation of the relevance of imprinting in the genesis of Bowlby’s attachment theory (2022) · cites this paper as Van der Horst, 2011
Citations
Cited by
Video Feedback Intervention With Children: A Systematic Review
Balldin, S., Fisher, P. A., & Wirtberg, I. (2016) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731516671809 · Cited by 84
John Bowlby and Attachment Theory
Karbowa-Płowens, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_3574 · Cited by 74
AINSWORTH'S STRANGE SITUATION PROCEDURE: THE ORIGIN OF AN INSTRUMENT
van Rosmalen, L., van der Veer, R., & van der Horst, F. C. P. (2015) · Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/jhbs.21729 · Cited by 94
Self-citationvan Rosmalen, L., van der Horst, F. C. P., & van der Veer, R. (2016) · History of Psychology · doi:10.1037/hop0000015 · Cited by 56
Self-citationDisorganized attachment and defense: exploring John Bowlby’s unpublished reflections
Reisz, S., Duschinsky, R., & Siegel, D. J. (2017) · Attachment & Human Development · doi:10.1080/14616734.2017.1380055 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Horst, F. C. P.
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-17
- OpenAlex
- W1591721422
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.13
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- John Bowlby, attachment theory, history of psychology, psychoanalysis, ethology, Harry Harlow, James Robertson, Mary Ainsworth, workplace relationships
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
