Cited by 9Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent Advances in Object Detection Based on YOLO‐V4 and Faster RCNN: A Review

Open access
Das, Anwesa, Nandi, Atanu, Deb, Ishani·2024·Mathematical Modeling for Computer Applications

Abstract

In 21st century object detection technique in computer vision and image processing is popular trends that deal with detecting occurrences of individuals, buildings, and vehicles, etc., from respective images and videos. Object Detection has received significant experimental interest in recent years due to its close relationship with video analysis and picture processing. For beginners, distinguishing between similar computer vision applications might take a lot of work. Currently, the approach to object recognition has grown into two categories: classic machine learning approaches that employ various computer vision methods and deep learning techniques that emerge from machine learning approaches for utilizing artificial neural networks. This article will introduce the subject of object identification as well as cutting-edge deep learning methods which are developed to handle it. We emphasize popular generic object detection models, as well as certain modifications and useful strategies for improving detection performance even further. For analysis, two significant types of deep learning approaches are chosen. The methods are FASTER R-CNN and YOLO-V4. The techniques presented in the article are briefly contrasted with the real-time images and videos for analyzing the objects.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781394248438.ch23

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Ren Yun, 2018, Object detection based on fast/faster rcnn employing fully convolutional architectures, Math. Probl. Eng., 2018, 1, 10.1155/2018/3598316 · DOI
  2. Ren Shaoqing, 2015, Faster r‐cnn: Towards real‐time object detection with region proposal networks, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 28
  3. Ding Sheng, 2018, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng, 062024
  4. Kim Chulyeon, 2018, A hybrid framework combining background subtraction and deep neural networks for rapid person detection, J. Big Data, 5, 1
  5. Ahmad Tanvir, 2020, Object detection through modified yolo neural network, Sci. Program., 2020, 1
  6. 10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Shi Jian‐Feng, 2018, 2018 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 1604
  8. Miao Jishu, 2021, VISIGRAPP (5: VISAPP), 569

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Das, A., Nandi, A., & Deb, I.
Affiliations
University of Engineering & Management (IN)
Venue
Mathematical Modeling for Computer Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-09-13
Pages
405-417
OpenAlex
W4402504828
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
object detection, YOLOv4, Faster R-CNN, real-time video analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review