The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent Advances in Object Detection Based on YOLO‐V4 and Faster RCNN: A Review
Open accessAbstract
In 21st century object detection technique in computer vision and image processing is popular trends that deal with detecting occurrences of individuals, buildings, and vehicles, etc., from respective images and videos. Object Detection has received significant experimental interest in recent years due to its close relationship with video analysis and picture processing. For beginners, distinguishing between similar computer vision applications might take a lot of work. Currently, the approach to object recognition has grown into two categories: classic machine learning approaches that employ various computer vision methods and deep learning techniques that emerge from machine learning approaches for utilizing artificial neural networks. This article will introduce the subject of object identification as well as cutting-edge deep learning methods which are developed to handle it. We emphasize popular generic object detection models, as well as certain modifications and useful strategies for improving detection performance even further. For analysis, two significant types of deep learning approaches are chosen. The methods are FASTER R-CNN and YOLO-V4. The techniques presented in the article are briefly contrasted with the real-time images and videos for analyzing the objects.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The evolution of the YOLO framework from 2015 to 2023 showcases the iterative enhancements made in response to emerging challenges in object detection [38].”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cites
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Ren Yun, 2018, Object detection based on fast/faster rcnn employing fully convolutional architectures, Math. Probl. Eng., 2018, 1, 10.1155/2018/3598316 · DOI
- Ren Shaoqing, 2015, Faster r‐cnn: Towards real‐time object detection with region proposal networks, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 28
- Ding Sheng, 2018, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng, 062024
- Kim Chulyeon, 2018, A hybrid framework combining background subtraction and deep neural networks for rapid person detection, J. Big Data, 5, 1
- Ahmad Tanvir, 2020, Object detection through modified yolo neural network, Sci. Program., 2020, 1
- 10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 · DOI · Paper page
- Shi Jian‐Feng, 2018, 2018 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 1604
- Miao Jishu, 2021, VISIGRAPP (5: VISAPP), 569
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, M. L., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13120336 · Cited by 383
Metadata
- Authors
- Das, A., Nandi, A., & Deb, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Engineering & Management (IN)
- Venue
- Mathematical Modeling for Computer Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-09-13
- Pages
- 405-417
- OpenAlex
- W4402504828
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- object detection, YOLOv4, Faster R-CNN, real-time video analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review