Approach to the Patient with Occult Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Quantifying blood loss Gastrointestinal hemoglobin metabolism Iron metabolism and deficiency Etiology of blood loss Clinical manifestations of blood loss Assessment and diagnostic strategies Fecal blood screening for colorectal neoplasia Therapeutic considerations References
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FIT is human-specific, not affected by dietary artifact, and detects primarily lower intestinal bleeding.
“FIT has been increasingly the FOBT of choice for CRC screening, as it is human-specific, not affected by dietary artifact, and detects primarily lower intestinal bleeding [3, 6, 7].”
From Novel Approach to Fecal Occult Blood Testing by Assay of Erythrocyte-Specific microRNA Markers (2017) · cites this paper as [3]
FOBT approaches have historically relied on detecting components of hemoglobin.
“Historically, FOBT approaches have relied on detecting components of hemoglobin, each with distinct advantages and limitations [3].”
From Novel Approach to Fecal Occult Blood Testing by Assay of Erythrocyte-Specific microRNA Markers (2017) · cites this paper as [3]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Novel Approach to Fecal Occult Blood Testing by Assay of Erythrocyte-Specific microRNA Markers
Wu, C. W., Cao, X., Berger, C. K., Foote, P. H., Mahoney, D. W., Simonson, J. A., Anderson, B. W., Yab, T. C., Taylor, W. R., Boardman, L. A., et al. (2017) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10620-017-4627-6 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Ahlquist, D. A., & Young, G. P.
- Venue
- Principles of Clinical Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-30
- Pages
- 152-169
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
