Cited by 3Medieval Philosophy and TheologyCatholicism and Religious StudiesHistorical Economic and Legal Thought

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neo‐Scholasticism

Del Colle, Ralph·2010·The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth‐Century Theology

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: Scholasticism and the History of Catholic Thought The Rise of Neo-Scholasticism The Concerns of the Neo-Scholastics The Possibilities of Neo-Scholasticism Conclusion Bibliography

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781444319972.ch18

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cessario Romanus, 2003, A Short History of Thomism
  2. McCool Gerald A., 1989, Nineteenth Century Scholasticism: The Search for a Unitary Method
  3. Scheeben Matthias., 1954, Nature and Grace

Metadata

Authors
Del Colle, R.
Venue
The Blackwell Companion to Nineteenth‐Century Theology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-09
Pages
375-394
OpenAlex
W2912492577
Cited by
3
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Catholicism and Religious Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Legal Thought
Keywords
neo-scholasticism, scholasticism, Catholic thought, history of Catholic theology, Catholic philosophy, scholastic method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review