“Sustainable biomass conversion process assessment,”
Abstract
Process intensification and integration for sustainable design play an essential role in addressing and alleviating severe sustainable development challenges. It is prudent to evaluate a process design in its early stage development to ensure the process can achieve sustainability goals. The primary goal of a sustainability evaluation is to assess the impact of systems on areas sought to be protected and maintained over time, such as human well-being and ecosystems (Schaubroeck, T. and Rugani, B. (2017). A revision of what life cycle sustainability assessment should entail: towards modeling the net impact on human well-being. Journal of Industrial Ecology 21 (6): 1464–1477). Parenthetically, sustainable process design to convert biomass to fuels and chemicals plays an integral part in the bioeconomy sustainability. It is recognized that the integration of sustainability in process design is core to the mission in developing renewable fuels and should be considered a necessary practice in biorefinery design. This study demonstrates the use of Gauging Reaction Effectiveness for ENvironmental Sustainability of Chemistries with a multi-Objective Process Evaluator (GREENSCOPE) as a tool to help track progress on process sustainability performance attributed to conversion improvement. With the incorporation of a wide range of indicators, GREENSCOPE captures the multi-dimensional aspect of the process design and operation. As opposed to conventional techno-economic analysis and life…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human actions since the Industrial Revolution have become the primary driver of global environmental change.
“Human actions since the Industrial Revolution have become the primary driver of global environmental change.”
From Circular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Tan, 2021
A flawed relationship between humans and the natural environment has caused thresholds and tipping points linked to planetary boundaries, such as biodiversity loss and a global climate crisis.
“There has been a flawed relationship between humans and the natural environment that has caused us to face thresholds and tipping points linked to planetary boundaries, such as biodiversity loss and a global climate crisis (Tan, 2021).”
From Circular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Tan, 2021
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 12 · Cited by 6
- Authors
- Tan, E. C. D.
- Affiliations
- National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tan, Eric C. D.
- ORCID
- Tan, Eric C. D.
- Venue
- Process Intensification and Integration for Sustainable Design
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-12-04
- Pages
- 301-318
- OpenAlex
- W3113034974
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Process Optimization and Integration
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Keywords
- biomass conversion, process intensification, process integration, biorefinery design, bioeconomy, woody biomass, high-octane gasoline, sustainability indicators
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review