Cited by 60Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsEpigenetics and DNA MethylationDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Alzheimer's loci: epigenetic associations and interaction with genetic factors

Open access
Chibnik, Lori B., Yu, Lei, Eaton, Matthew L., Srivastava, Gyan, Schneider, Julie A., Kellis, Manolis, Bennett, David A., De Jager, Philip L.·2015·Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology

Abstract

Objective: We explore the role of DNA methylation in Alzheimer's disease ( AD ). To elucidate where DNA methylation falls along the causal pathway linking risk factors to disease, we examine causal models to assess its role in the pathology of AD . Methods: DNA methylation profiles were generated in 740 brain samples using the Illumina HumanMet450K beadset. We focused our analysis on CpG sites from 11 AD susceptibility gene regions. The primary outcome was a quantitative measure of neuritic amyloid plaque ( NP ), a key early element of AD pathology. We tested four causal models: (1) independent associations, (2) CpG mediating the association of a variant, (3) reverse causality, and (4) genetic variant by CpG interaction. Results: Six genes regions (17 CpGs) showed evidence of CpG associations with NP , independent of genetic variation – BIN 1 (5), CLU (5), MS 4A6A (3), ABCA 7 (2), CD 2 AP (1), and APOE (1). Together they explained 16.8% of the variability in NP . An interaction effect was seen in the CR 1 region for two CpGs, cg10021878 ( P = 0.01) and cg05922028 ( P = 0.001), in relation to NP . In both cases, subjects with the risk allele rs6656401 AT / AA display more methylation being associated with more NP burden, whereas subjects with the rs6656401 TT protective genotype have an inverse association with more methylation being associated with less NP . Interpretation: These observations suggest that, within known AD susceptibility loci, methylation is related to pathologic processes of AD and may play a largely independent role by influencing gene expression in AD susceptibility loci.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acn3.201

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The limited commonality between genetic and epigenetic loci in AD could be due to low power in EWAS and/or GWAS but could also reflect relatively independent roles of genetic variants and DNA methylation in influencing AD susceptibility.

    “The limited commonality between genetic and epigenetic loci in AD could be due to the low power in EWAS and/or GWAS but could also reflect the relatively independent roles of genetic variants and DNA methylation in influencing AD susceptibility [65, 66].”

    From Distinct sex-specific DNA methylation differences in Alzheimer’s disease (2022) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Introduction and Abstract Interpretation say that genetic variation and DNA methylation may have largely independent roles in AD pathology and susceptibility. The Introduction also says stringent multiple-comparison criteria limited an earlier methylome-wide analysis. However, the paper does not establish the claimed limited commonality between genetic and epigenetic loci or specifically attribute it to low power in EWAS and/or GWAS. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Targeted studies have revealed methylation alterations at additional loci associated with disease.

    “Targeted studies have revealed methylation alterations at additional loci associated with disease [195–197]”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [197]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Lambert JC Heath S Even G Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer’s disease Nat Genet 2009 41 1094 1099 19734903
  2. Hollingworth P Harold D Sims R Common variants at ABCA7, MS4A6A/MS4A4E, EPHA1, CD33 and CD2AP are associated with Alzheimer’s disease Nat Genet 2011 43 429 435 21460840 PMC3084173
  3. Carrasquillo MM Zou F Pankratz VS Genetic variation in PCDH11X is associated with susceptibility to late-onset Alzheimer’s disease Nat Genet 2009 41 192 198 19136949 PMC2873177
  4. Bertram L Tanzi RE Genome-wide association studies in Alzheimer’s disease Hum Mol Genet 2009 18 R2 R137 R145 19808789 PMC2758713
  5. Seshadri S Fitzpatrick AL Ikram MA Genome-wide analysis of genetic loci associated with Alzheimer disease JAMA 2010 303 1832 1840 20460622 PMC2989531
  6. Lambert JC Ibrahim-Verbaas CA Harold D Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease Nat Genet 2013 45 1452 1458 24162737 PMC3896259
  7. Chibnik LB Shulman JM Leurgans SE CR1 is associated with amyloid plaque burden and age-related cognitive decline Ann Neurol 2011 69 560 569 21391232 PMC3066288
  8. Keenan BT Shulman JM Chibnik LB A coding variant in CR1 interacts with APOE-epsilon4 to influence cognitive decline Hum Mol Genet 2012 21 2377 2388 22343410 PMC3335317
  9. Shulman JM Chen K Keenan BT Genetic susceptibility for Alzheimer disease neuritic plaque pathology JAMA Neurol 2013 70 1150 1157 23836404 PMC3773291
  10. Allen M Zou F Chai HS Novel late-onset Alzheimer disease loci variants associate with brain gene expression Neurology 2012 79 221 228 22722634 PMC3398432
  11. Chapuis J Hansmannel F Gistelinck M Increased expression of BIN1 mediates Alzheimer genetic risk by modulating tau pathology Mol Psychiatry 2013 18 1225 1234 23399914 PMC3807661
  12. Raj T Shulman JM Keenan BT Alzheimer disease susceptibility loci: evidence for a protein network under natural selection Am J Hum Genet 2012 90 720 726 22482808 PMC3322230
  13. Vasquez JB Fardo DW Estus S ABCA7 expression is associated with Alzheimer’s disease polymorphism and disease status Neurosci Lett 2013 556 58 62 24141082 PMC3863933
  14. Bennett DA Schneider JA Buchman AS Overview and findings from the rush Memory and Aging Project Curr Alzheimer Res 2012 9 646 663 22471867 PMC3439198
  15. Bennett DA Schneider JA Arvanitakis Z Wilson RS Overview and findings from the religious orders study Curr Alzheimer Res 2012 9 628 645 22471860 PMC3409291
  16. De Jager PL Shulman JM Chibnik LB A genome-wide scan for common variants affecting the rate of age-related cognitive decline Neurobiol Aging 2012 33 1017.e1 1017.e15 22054870 PMC3307898
  17. Naj AC Beecham GW Martin ER Dementia revealed: novel chromosome 6 locus for late-onset Alzheimer disease provides genetic evidence for folate-pathway abnormalities PLoS Genet 2010 6 e1001130 20885792 PMC2944795
  18. Chen YA Lemire M Choufani S Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray Epigenetics 2013 8 203 209 23314698 PMC3592906
  19. Ernst J Kheradpour P Mikkelsen TS Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types Nature 2011 473 43 49 21441907 PMC3088773
  20. Bennett DA Schneider JA Tang Y The effect of social networks on the relation between Alzheimer’s disease pathology and level of cognitive function in old people: a longitudinal cohort study Lancet Neurol 2006 5 406 412 16632311

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chibnik, L. B., Yu, L., Eaton, M. L., Srivastava, G., Schneider, J. A., Kellis, M., Bennett, D. A., & De Jager, P. L.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Program in Translational NeuroPsychiatric Genomics Institute for the Neurosciences Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts 02115
Venue
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-24
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
636-647
ISSN
2328-9503 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083357269
Cited by
60
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (P30AG10161, R01AG15819, R01AG17917, R01AG36042, R01AG36836, U01AG46152)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, DNA methylation, epigenetics, genetic-epigenetic interaction, reverse causality, mediation analysis, BIN1, clusterin, MS4A6A, ABCA7, CD2AP, apolipoprotein E, complement receptor 1, brain tissue, gene expression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review