Novel CSF biomarkers to discriminate FTLD and its pathological subtypes
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is the second most prevalent dementia in young patients and is characterized by the presence of two main protein aggregates in the brain, tau (FTLD‐Tau) or TDP 43 (FTLD‐TDP), which likely require distinct pharmacological therapy. However, specific diagnosis of FTLD and its subtypes remains challenging due to largely overlapping clinical phenotypes. Here, we aimed to assess the clinical performance of novel cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for discrimination of FTLD and its pathological subtypes. Methods: YKL 40, FABP 4, MFG‐E8, and the activities of catalase and specific lysosomal enzymes were analyzed in patients with FTLD‐TDP (n = 30), FTLD‐Tau (n = 20), AD (n = 30), DLB (n = 29), and nondemented controls (n = 29) obtained from two different centers. Models were validated in an independent CSF cohort (n = 188). Results: YKL 40 and catalase activity were increased in FTLD‐TDP cases compared to controls. YKL 40 levels were also higher in FTLD‐TDP compared to FTLD‐Tau. We identified biomarker models able to discriminate FTLD from nondemented controls (MFG‐E8, tT au, and A β42; 78% sensitivity and 83% specificity) and non‐FTLD dementia (YKL 40, pT au, p/tT au ratio, and age; 90% sensitivity, 78% specificity), which were validated in an independent cohort. In addition, we identified a biomarker model differentiating FTLD‐TDP from FTLD‐Tau (YKL 40, MFGE‐8, β HexA together with β HexA/tH ex and p/tT au ratios and age) with 80% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Interpretation: This study identifies CSF protein signatures distinguishing FTLD and the two main pathological subtypes with optimal accuracy (specificity/sensitivity > 80%). Validation of these models may allow appropriate selection of cases for clinical trials targeting the accumulation of Tau or TDP 43, thereby increasing their efficiency and facilitating the development of successful therapies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CSF p-tau/t-tau ratio demarcates FTD-TDP patients from FTD-tau cases with sensitivity and specificity values around 82% and 62%, respectively.
“Several independent studies have shown that CSF p‐tau/t‐tau ratio demarcate FTD‐TDP patients from FTD‐tau cases with sensitivity and specificity values around 82% and 62%, respectively.”
From New developments of biofluid‐based biomarkers for routine diagnosis and disease trajectories in frontotemporal dementia (2022) · cites this paper as [95]
Non-hypothesis driven proteomics studies have identified multiple proteins that are differentially expressed in FTLD neuropathological or genetic subtypes.
“Non‐hypothesis driven proteomics studies have identified multiple proteins that are differentially expressed in FTLD neuropathological or genetic subtypes.”
From New developments of biofluid‐based biomarkers for routine diagnosis and disease trajectories in frontotemporal dementia (2022) · cites this paper as [95]
Novel proteins identified through MS approaches can then be measured as single analytes using immunoassays or incorporated into panels of protein arrays for further validation studies.
“Novel proteins identified through MS approaches can then be measured as single analytes using immunoassays or incorporated into panels of protein arrays for further validation studies. 95 , 103 , 104 , 130 , 131”
From New developments of biofluid‐based biomarkers for routine diagnosis and disease trajectories in frontotemporal dementia (2022) · cites this paper as [95]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 30
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [7]International Conference on Frontotemporal Dementias 2016. Fluid NfL Shines, Tau PET Dims, in the Hunt for FTD Biomarkers|ALZFORUM. [date unknown]; Available from: http://www.alzforum.org/news/conference-coverage/fluid-nfl-shines-tau-pet-dims-hunt-ftd-biomarkers
- Authors
- del Campo, M., Galimberti, D., Elias, N., Boonkamp, L., Pijnenburg, Y. A., van Swieten, J. C., Watts, K., Paciotti, S., Beccari, T., Hu, W., & Teunissen, C. E.
- Affiliations
- Neurochemistry Laboratory and Biobank Department of Clinical Chemistry Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam VU University Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands
- University of Milan (IT)
- Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
- Alzheimer Centre and Department of Neurology Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Emory University (US)
- University of Perugia (IT)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-09-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1163-1175
- ISSN
- 2328-9503 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6186934
- OpenAlex
- W2891159306
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration
- Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
- ZonMw
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- frontotemporal lobar degeneration, FTLD-TDP, FTLD-tau, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, YKL-40, MFG-E8, catalase activity, lysosomal enzymes, tau phosphorylation, TDP-43, differential diagnosis of dementia, biomarker model, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review