Cited by 30Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Novel CSF biomarkers to discriminate FTLD and its pathological subtypes

Open access
del Campo, Marta, Galimberti, Daniela, Elias, Naura, Boonkamp, Lynn, Pijnenburg, Yolande A., van Swieten, John C., Watts, Kelly, Paciotti, Silvia +3 more·2018·Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is the second most prevalent dementia in young patients and is characterized by the presence of two main protein aggregates in the brain, tau (FTLD‐Tau) or TDP 43 (FTLD‐TDP), which likely require distinct pharmacological therapy. However, specific diagnosis of FTLD and its subtypes remains challenging due to largely overlapping clinical phenotypes. Here, we aimed to assess the clinical performance of novel cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for discrimination of FTLD and its pathological subtypes. Methods: YKL 40, FABP 4, MFG‐E8, and the activities of catalase and specific lysosomal enzymes were analyzed in patients with FTLD‐TDP (n = 30), FTLD‐Tau (n = 20), AD (n = 30), DLB (n = 29), and nondemented controls (n = 29) obtained from two different centers. Models were validated in an independent CSF cohort (n = 188). Results: YKL 40 and catalase activity were increased in FTLD‐TDP cases compared to controls. YKL 40 levels were also higher in FTLD‐TDP compared to FTLD‐Tau. We identified biomarker models able to discriminate FTLD from nondemented controls (MFG‐E8, tT au, and A β42; 78% sensitivity and 83% specificity) and non‐FTLD dementia (YKL 40, pT au, p/tT au ratio, and age; 90% sensitivity, 78% specificity), which were validated in an independent cohort. In addition, we identified a biomarker model differentiating FTLD‐TDP from FTLD‐Tau (YKL 40, MFGE‐8, β HexA together with β HexA/tH ex and p/tT au ratios and age) with 80% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Interpretation: This study identifies CSF protein signatures distinguishing FTLD and the two main pathological subtypes with optimal accuracy (specificity/sensitivity > 80%). Validation of these models may allow appropriate selection of cases for clinical trials targeting the accumulation of Tau or TDP 43, thereby increasing their efficiency and facilitating the development of successful therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acn3.629

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 30

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]International Conference on Frontotemporal Dementias 2016. Fluid NfL Shines, Tau PET Dims, in the Hunt for FTD Biomarkers|ALZFORUM. [date unknown]; Available from: http://www.alzforum.org/news/conference-coverage/fluid-nfl-shines-tau-pet-dims-hunt-ftd-biomarkers

Authors
del Campo, M., Galimberti, D., Elias, N., Boonkamp, L., Pijnenburg, Y. A., van Swieten, J. C., Watts, K., Paciotti, S., Beccari, T., Hu, W., & Teunissen, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Neurochemistry Laboratory and Biobank Department of Clinical Chemistry Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam VU University Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
  • Alzheimer Centre and Department of Neurology Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Perugia (IT)
Venue
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-07
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
1163-1175
ISSN
2328-9503 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891159306
Cited by
30
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration
  • Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
  • ZonMw
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
frontotemporal lobar degeneration, FTLD-TDP, FTLD-tau, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, YKL-40, MFG-E8, catalase activity, lysosomal enzymes, tau phosphorylation, TDP-43, differential diagnosis of dementia, biomarker model, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review