Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Passport Checks: Interactions Between Matching Faces and Biographical Details

McCaffery, Jennifer M., Burton, A. Mike·2016·Applied Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Summary: Matching unfamiliar faces is known to be a difficult task. However, most research has tested viewers' ability to match pairs of faces presented in isolation. In real settings, professionals are commonly required to examine photo ID that contains other biographical information too. In three experiments, we present faces embedded in passport frames and ask viewers to make face matching decisions and to check biographical information. We find that the inclusion of a passport frame reduces viewers' ability to detect a face mismatch. Furthermore, the nature of the face match influences biographical data checking—true matches lead to fewer detections of invalid data. In general, viewers were poor at spotting errors in biographical information. This pattern suggests that detection of fraudulent photo ID is even harder than current experimental studies suggest. Possible mechanisms for these effects are discussed. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acp.3281

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Criterion is influenced by the applied context in which face matching is studied.

    “as well as the applied context in which face matching is studied (e.g., Bindemann et al., 2022;Feng & Burton, 2019, 2021;McCaffery & Burton, 2016;Tummon et al., 2019)”

    From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as McCaffery & Burton, 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Anastasi J. S., 2006, Evidence for an own‐age bias in face recognition, North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 237
  2. 10.1068/p7008 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.concog.2005.06.001 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/h0084165 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1080/713755780 · DOI
  7. 10.3758/BRM.42.1.286 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1002/acp.1490 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.017 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00273-O · DOI
  11. Fender M., 2008, Spelling knowledge and reading development: Insights from Arab ESL learners, Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 19
  12. 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.008 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.3758/BF03194801 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/09658210902976969 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/acp.2350040203 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199706)11:3<211::AID-ACP430>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  18. 10.1111/1467-9280.03453 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1080/10862968609547571 · DOI
  20. 10.3758/BF03193433 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1037/a0013464 · DOI
  22. Menneer T., 2012, Search for two categories of target produces fewer fixations to target‐color items, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 404
  23. 10.5334/pb.aq · DOI
  24. 10.3758/BF03211378 · DOI
  25. 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1167/4.2.4 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/lhb0000190 · DOI
  28. 10.1037/a0025065 · DOI
  29. 10.1371/journal.pone.0103510 · DOI · Paper page
  30. White D. Phillips P. J. Hahn C. A. Hill M. &O'Toole A. J.(2015).Perceptual expertise in forensic facial image comparison.Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences 282(20151291). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McCaffery, J. M., & Burton, A. M.
Affiliations
Department of Psychology University of York York UK
Venue
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-11
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
925-933
ISSN
  • 0888-4080
  • 1099-0720
Cited by
23
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • European Research Council (323262)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/J022950/1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review