Report of the American College of Rheumatology Pain Management Task Force
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chronic pain is often defined by pain duration, yielding prevalence estimates ranging from 19% to 43%, or up to 116 million Americans.
“Chronic pain is often defined by pain duration,1,13,23,25,26 where pain persisting 3 to 6 months or more because onset can yield prevalence estimates for chronic pain ranging from 19 to 43%, or ≤ 116 million Americans.10,12,15,19,26”
From Prevalence and Profile of High-Impact Chronic Pain in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- American College of Rheumatology Pain Management Task Force
- Venue
- Arthritis Care & Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-04-29
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 590-599
- ISSN
- 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-464X
- 2151-4658
- OpenAlex
- W997725819
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Arthritis Care & Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- pain management, rheumatic diseases, chronic pain, pain management guidelines, American College of Rheumatology
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Pain, Rheumatology, Societies, Medical, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Advisory Committees, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
