Cited by 66Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

Cognitive–behavioral therapy attenuates nociceptive responding in patients with fibromyalgia: A pilot study

Ang, Dennis C., Chakr, Rafael, Mazzuca, Steve, France, Christopher R., Steiner, Jennifer, Stump, Timothy·2010·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective To explore the possibility that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) influences fibromyalgia symptoms via descending inhibition of nociception, we evaluated the effects of CBT on the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold, an objective measure of spinal nociceptive transmission. Methods Female fibromyalgia patients (n = 32) were randomized to 6 weekly sessions of telephone-delivered CBT or usual care (UC). Assessments of the NFR threshold and clinical outcomes were conducted at baseline, week 6 (post-CBT), and week 12. Results From baseline to week 6, the NFR threshold increased in the CBT group and decreased in the UC group (mean +/- SD 4.4 +/- 13.7 mA versus -10.2 +/- 9.9 mA; P = 0.005). This difference was also apparent at week 12 (mean +/- SD 7.3 +/- 9.2 mA for CBT versus -5.4 +/- 13.5 mA for UC; P = 0.01). The groups reported similar reductions in NFR pain ratings at week 6 (mean +/- SD -20.2 +/- 23.9 for CBT versus -14.9 +/- 16.4 for UC; P = 0.8) and week 12 (mean +/- SD -8.9 +/- 25.3 for CBT versus -10.8 +/- 24.1 for UC; P = 0.4). Conclusion Compared with UC, CBT reduced nociceptive responding in fibromyalgia patients. Moreover, while the UC group exhibited longitudinal decreases in both the stimulation level and pain associated with the NFR threshold, those receiving CBT required more intense stimulation to elicit the NFR as well as rated that stimulation as less painful than at baseline. These data indicate the need for a larger study to confirm that chan…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acr.20119

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 66

Authors
Ang, D. C., Chakr, R., Mazzuca, S., France, C. R., Steiner, J., & Stump, T.
Affiliations
Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-29
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
618-623
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-464X
  • 2151-4658
OpenAlex
W1976787256
Cited by
66
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthritis Care & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, fibromyalgia, nociception, descending inhibition, nociceptive flexion reflex, spinal nociceptive transmission, telephone-delivered therapy, pain intensity
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Pilot Projects, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Pain Threshold, Statistics, Nonparametric, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review