The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hyperuricemia and incident hypertension: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Open accessAbstract
Objective: A novel rodent model and a recent randomized trial of hyperuricemic adolescents with hypertension suggest a pathogenetic role of uric acid in hypertension, but it remains unknown whether these findings would be applicable to adult populations where the larger disease burden exists. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine if hyperuricemia was associated with incident hypertension, particularly in various demographic subgroups. Methods: We searched major electronic databases using medical subject headings and keywords without language restrictions (through April 2010). We included prospective cohort studies with data on incident hypertension related to serum uric acid levels. Data abstraction was conducted in duplicate. We analyzed age, sex, and race subgroups. Results: A total of 18 prospective cohort studies representing data from 55,607 participants were included. Hyperuricemia was associated with an increased risk for incident hypertension (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.23–1.58). For a 1 mg/dl increase in uric acid level, the pooled RR for incident hypertension after adjusting for potential confounding was 1.13 (95% CI 1.06–1.20). These effects were significantly larger in younger study populations (P = 0.02) and tended to be larger in women (P = 0.059). Two studies suggested that the effect may also be larger among African American individuals. Furthermore, later publication year and US‐based studies were significantly associated with a lower effect estimate (P values <0.02). Conclusion: Hyperuricemia is associated with an increased risk for incident hypertension, independent of traditional hypertension risk factors. This risk appears more pronounced in younger individuals and women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis
Sterne, J. A. C., & Egger, M. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00377-8 · Cited by 3,779
meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61 · Cited by 1,374
The Burden of Adult Hypertension in the United States 1999 to 2000: A Rising Tide
Fields, L. E., Burt, V. L., Cutler, J. A., Hughes, J., Roccella, E. J., & Sorlie, P. (2004) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000142248.54761.56 · Cited by 906 · cited 1×
“Hypertension affects approximately one-third of Americans (1) and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality (2).”
Background
Cited by
Te Morenga, L. A., Howatson, A. J., Jones, R. M., & Mann, J. (2014) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.081521 · Cited by 509
Hyperuricaemia and gout in cardiovascular, metabolic and kidney disease
Borghi, C., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Johnson, R. J., Kielstein, J. T., Lurbe, E., Mancia, G., Redon, J., Stack, A. G., & Tsioufis, K. P. (2020) · European Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2020.07.006 · Cited by 435
Asymptomatic hyperuricaemia: a silent activator of the innate immune system
Joosten, L. A. B., Crişan, T. O., Bjornstad, P., & Johnson, R. J. (2020) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/s41584-019-0334-3 · Cited by 319
Allopurinol and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Adults With Hypertension
MacIsaac, R. L., Salatzki, J., Higgins, P., Walters, M. R., Padmanabhan, S., Dominiczak, A. F., Touyz, R. M., & Dawson, J. (2016) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.115.06344 · Cited by 124
Shirakura, T., Nomura, J., Matsui, C., Kobayashi, T., Tamura, M., & Masuzaki, H. (2016) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-016-1239-1 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Grayson, P. C., Kim, S. Y., LaValley, M., & Choi, H. K.
- Venue
- Arthritis Care & Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12-28
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102-110
- ISSN
- 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-464X
- 2151-4658
- OpenAlex
- W1757751439
- Cited by
- 756
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperuricemia and incident hypertension: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/acr.20344
- The paper
- Grayson, P. C., Kim, S. Y., LaValley, M., & Choi, H. K. (2011). Hyperuricemia and incident hypertension: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Arthritis Care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20344
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.