Phase III Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Tocilizumab Monotherapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacious noninferiority of subcutaneous tocilizumab injection (TCZ‐SC) monotherapy to intravenous TCZ infusion (TCZ‐IV) monotherapy in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to synthetic and/or biologic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Methods: This study had a double‐blind, parallel‐group, double‐dummy, comparative phase III design. Patients were randomized to receive TCZ‐SC 162 mg every 2 weeks or TCZ‐IV 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks; no DMARDs were allowed during the study. The primary end point was to evaluate the noninferiority of TCZ‐SC to TCZ‐IV regarding the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement in disease activity (ACR20) response rates at week 24 using an 18% noninferiority margin. Additional efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic, and immunogenicity parameters were assessed. Results: At week 24, ACR20 response was achieved in 79.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 72.9, 85.5) of the TCZ‐SC group and in 88.5% (95% CI 83.4, 93.5) of the TCZ‐IV group; the weighted difference was −9.4% (95% CI −17.6, −1.2), confirming the noninferiority of TCZ‐SC to TCZ‐IV. Remission rates of the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the Clinical Disease Activity Index at week 24 were 49.7% and 16.4% in the TCZ‐SC group and 62.2% and 23.1% in the TCZ‐IV group, respectively. Serum trough TCZ concentrations were similar between the groups over time. Incidences of all adverse events and serious adverse events were 89.0% and 7.5% in the TCZ‐SC group and 90.8% and 5.8% in the TCZ‐IV group, respectively. Anti‐TCZ antibodies were detected in 3.5% of the TCZ‐SC group; no serious hypersensitivity was reported in these patients. Conclusion: TCZ‐SC monotherapy demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to TCZ‐IV monotherapy. TCZ‐SC could provide additional treatment options for patients with RA.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A lack of impact of ADAs on efficacy, safety, or pharmacokinetics was also described for abatacept or tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis.
“A lack of impact of ADAs on efficacy, safety, or pharmacokinetics was also described for abatacept or tocilizumab in RA [85, 86].”
From Subcutaneous Administration of Biotherapeutics: An Overview of Current Challenges and Opportunities (2018) · cites this paper as [86]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 140
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- International Conference on Harmonisation E9 Expert Working Group ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: statistical principles for clinical trials Stat Med 1999 18 1905 42 10532877
- Authors
- Ogata, A., Tanimura, K., Sugimoto, T., Inoue, H., Urata, Y., Matsubara, T., Kondo, M., Ueki, Y., Iwahashi, M., Tohma, S., Ohta, S., Saeki, Y., Tanaka, T., & the Musashi Study Investigators
- Affiliations
- The University of Osaka (JP)
- Hokkaido Medical Center for Rheumatic Diseases Hokkaido Japan
- National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital (JP)
- Inoue Hospital (JP)
- Seihoku Central Hospital, United Municipalities of Tsugaru Aomori Japan
- Matsubara Mayflower Hospital (JP)
- Kondo Clinic of Rheumatology and Orthopedic Surgery Fukuoka Japan
- Sasebo Chuo Hospital (JP)
- Higashihiroshima Medical Center (JP)
- National Sagamihara Hospital (JP)
- Taga General Hospital Ibaraki Japan
- Osaka Minami Medical Center (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Ogata, Atsushi
- ORCID
- Venue
- Arthritis Care & Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02-24
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 344-354
- ISSN
- 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-464X
- 2151-4658
- PMC
- PMC4225471
- OpenAlex
- W1608734376
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Arthritis Care & Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Genentech
- Chugai Pharmaceutical
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
- Keywords
- tocilizumab, rheumatoid arthritis, subcutaneous administration, intravenous infusion, monotherapy, non-inferiority, ACR20 response, remission, adverse events, pharmacokinetics, Japanese patients, biologic DMARDs, treatment efficacy and safety, immunogenicity, hypersensitivity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Antirheumatic Agents, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review