Smokeless Tobacco (Moist Snuff) Use and the Risk of Developing Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From a Case–Control Study
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the association between snuff use (smokeless tobacco containing nicotine) and the risk of anti–citrullinated protein/peptide antibody (ACPA)–positive and ACPA‐negative rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Data from the Swedish Epidemiological Investigation of Rheumatoid Arthritis, a population‐based case–control study including 1,998 incident cases and 2,252 randomly selected controls (matched on age, sex, and residential area) ages 18–70 years, were analyzed. Ever, current, and past moist snuff users were compared with never users. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) by means of unconditional logistic regression models. All analyses were adjusted for cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and the matching variables. Results: In total, 254 (13%) cases were ever moist snuff users compared with 290 (13%) controls, resulting in an OR of 1.0 (95% CI 0.8–1.2) of RA overall. When exposure to moist snuff was analyzed in relation to ACPA‐positive and ACPA‐negative disease, no associations were observed. Neither current nor past moist snuff use was related to the risk of any of the 2 RA subgroups. Analyses restricted to never smokers provided similar results. Conclusion: The use of moist snuff was not associated with the risk of either ACPA‐positive or ACPA‐negative RA. The increased risk of RA associated with smoking is most probably not due to nicotine.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is no association between snus use and rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.8-1.2).
“No association between snus use and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (OR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.8-1.2) (Jiang et al. 2014)”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Jiang et al. 2014
There is no association between using snus and rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.8-1.2).
“no association between using snus and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (OR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.8-1.2) (Jiang et al. 2014).”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Jiang et al. 2014
Cites
Cholinergic agonists inhibit HMGB1 release and improve survival in experimental sepsis
Wang, H., Liao, H., Ochani, M., Justiniani, M., Lin, X., Yang, L., Al-Abed, Y., Wang, H., Metz, C., Miller, E. J., et al. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1124 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kopa-Stojak, P. N., & Pawliczak, R. (2026) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-026-00812-w
- Authors
- Jiang, X., Alfredsson, L., Klareskog, L., & Bengtsson, C.
- Venue
- Arthritis Care & Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-09-25
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1582-1586
- ISSN
- 2151-464X
- 2151-4658
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- VINNOVA
- AFA insurance
- EU funded IMI project BTCure
- King Gustaf V's 80-year foundation
- Swedish Research Council
- Swedish Research Council for Working Life, Health and Welfare
- Swedish Rheumatic Foundation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review