Cited by 58Connective tissue disorders researchPediatric Pain Management TechniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Generalized Hyperalgesia in Children and Adults Diagnosed With Hypermobility Syndrome and Ehlers‐Danlos Syndrome Hypermobility Type: A Discriminative Analysis

Open access
Scheper, M. C., Pacey, V., Rombaut, L., Adams, R. D., Tofts, L., Calders, P., Nicholson, L. L., Engelbert, R. H. H.·2017·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective: Lowered pressure‐pain thresholds have been demonstrated in adults with Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome hypermobility type (EDS‐HT), but whether these findings are also present in children is unclear. Therefore, the objectives of the study were to determine whether generalized hyperalgesia is present in children with hypermobility syndrome (HMS)/EDS‐HT, explore potential differences in pressure‐pain thresholds between children and adults with HMS/EDS‐HT, and determine the discriminative value of generalized hyperalgesia. Methods: Patients were classified in 1 of 3 groups: HMS/EDS‐HT, hypermobile (Beighton score ≥4 of 9), and healthy controls. Descriptive data of age, sex, body mass index, Beighton score, skin laxity, and medication usage were collected. Generalized hyperalgesia was quantified by the average pressure‐pain thresholds collected from 12 locations. Confounders collected were pain locations/intensity, fatigue, and psychological distress. Comparisons between children with HMS/EDS‐HT and normative values, between children and adults with HMS/EDS‐HT, and corrected confounders were analyzed with multivariate analysis of covariance. The discriminative value of generalized hyperalgesia employed to differentiate between HMS/EDS‐HT, hypermobility, and controls was quantified with logistic regression. Results: Significantly lower pressure‐pain thresholds were found in children with HMS/EDS‐HT compared to normative values (range −22.0% to −59.0%; P ≤ 0.05). When applying a threshold of 30.8 N/cm 2 for males and 29.0 N/cm 2 for females, the presence of generalized hyperalgesia discriminated between individuals with HMS/EDS‐HT, hypermobility, and healthy controls (odds ratio 6.0). Conclusion: Children and adults with HMS/EDS‐HT are characterized by hypermobility, chronic pain, and generalized hyperalgesia. The presence of generalized hyperalgesia may indicate involvement of the central nervous system in the development of chronic pain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acr.22998

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There may be involvement of the central nervous system in the development of chronic musculoskeletal pain in this group, demonstrated by low pressure pain thresholds.

    “There may be involvement of the central nervous system in the development of chronic musculoskeletal pain in this group, demonstrated by low pressure pain thresholds [44].”

    From Pediatric joint hypermobility: a diagnostic framework and narrative review (2023) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Discussion reports low pressure-pain thresholds in children and adults with HMS/EDS-HT and interprets generalized hyperalgesia as consistent with central nervous system hypersensitization. But its limitations state that the comparison does not establish the role of hyperalgesia in the development of musculoskeletal pain; low thresholds therefore do not demonstrate that developmental role. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 58

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Malfait F, Hakim AJ, De Paepe A, Grahame R. The genetic basis of the joint hypermobility syndromes. Rheumatology 2006;45:502-7.
  2. Scheper MC, Engelbert RH, Rameckers EA, Verbunt J, Remvig L, Juul-Kristensen B. Children with generalised joint hypermobility and musculoskeletal complaints: state of the art on diagnostics, clinical characteristics, and treatment. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:121054.
  3. Pacey V, Tofts L, Wesley A, Collins F, Singh-Grewal D. Joint hypermobility syndrome: a review for clinicians. J Paediatr Child Health 2015;51:373-80.
  4. Remvig L, Jensen DV, Ward RC. Are diagnostic criteria for general joint hypermobility and benign joint hypermobility syndrome based on reproducible and valid tests? A review of the literature. J Rheumatol 2007;34:798-803.
  5. Grahame R, Bird HA, Child A. The revised (Brighton 1998) criteria for the diagnosis of benign joint hypermobility syn- drome (BJHS). J Rheumatol 2000;27:1777-9.
  6. Beighton P, De Paepe A, Steinmann B, Tsipouras P, Wenstrup RJ. Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: revised nosology, Villefranche, 1997. Ehlers-Danlos National Foundation (USA) and Ehlers-Danlos Support Group (UK). Am J Med Genet 1998;77:31-7.
  7. De Wandele I, Calders P, Peersman W, Rimbaut S, De Backer T, Malfait F, et al. Autonomic symptom burden in the hypermobility type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a com- parative study with two other EDS types, fibromyalgia, and healthy controls. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2014;44:353-61.
  8. Rombaut L, Malfait F, De Wandele I, Mathieu N, Thijs Y, Segers P. Muscle-tendon tissue properties in the hypermo- bility type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:766-72.
  9. Russek LN. Hypermobility syndrome. Phys Ther Jun 1999; 79:591-9.
  10. Murray KJ. Hypermobility disorders in children and adoles- cents. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006;20:329-51.
  11. Sperotto F, Brachi S, Vittadello F, Zulian F. Musculoskeletal pain in schoolchildren across puberty: a 3-year follow-up study. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2015;13:16.
  12. El-Metwally A, Salminen JJ, Auvinen A, Kautiainen H, Mikkelsson M. Lower limb pain in a preadolescent popula- tion: prognosis and risk factors for chronicity-a prospective 1-and 4-year follow-up study. Pediatrics 2005;116:673-81.
  13. Scheper MC, de Vries JE, Juul-Kristensen B, Nollet F, Engelbert RH. The functional consequences of generalized joint hypermo- bility: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15:243.
  14. El-Metwally A, Salminen JJ, Auvinen A, Macfarlane G, Mikkelsson M. Risk factors for development of non-specific musculoskeletal pain in preteens and early adolescents: a pro- spective 1-year follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007;8:46.
  15. Mikkelsson M, El-Metwally A, Kautiainen H, Auvinen A, Macfarlane GJ, Salminen JJ. Onset, prognosis and risk factors for widespread pain in schoolchildren: a prospective 4-year follow-up study. Pain 2008;138:681-7.
  16. Walters SJ, Campbell MJ. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes. Stat Med 2005;24:1075-102.
  17. World Medical A. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310:2191-4.
  18. Hogeweg JA, Kuis W, Oostendorp RA, Helders PJ. The influ- ence of site of stimulation, age, and gender on pain thresh- old in healthy children. Phys Ther 1996;76:1331-9.
  19. Cathcart S, Pritchard D. Reliability of pain threshold mea- surement in young adults. J Headache Pain 2006;7:21-6.
  20. Nikolajsen L, Kristensen AD, Pedersen LK, Rahbek O, Jensen TS, Moller-Madsen B. Intra-and interrater agreement of pressure pain thresholds in children with orthopedic disorders. J Child Orthop 2011;5:173-8.
  21. Jorgensen R, Ris I, Falla D, Juul-Kristensen B. Reliability, construct and discriminative validity of clinical testing in subjects with and without chronic neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:408.
  22. Kinser AM, Sands WA, Stone MH. Reliability and validity of a pressure algometer. J Strength Cond Res 2009;23:312-4.
  23. Margolis RB, Tait RC, Krause SJ. A rating system for use with patient pain drawings. Pain 1986;24:57-65.
  24. Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I: aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 1983;16:87-101.
  25. Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Szer IS. The PedsQL Multidimen- sional Fatigue Scale in pediatric rheumatology: reliability and validity. J Rheumatol 2004;31:2494-2500.
  26. Vercoulen JH, Swanink CM, Fennis JF, Galama JM, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res 1994;38:383-92.
  27. Wigham S, McConachie H. Systematic review of the proper- ties of tools used to measure outcomes in anxiety interven- tion studies for children with autism spectrum disorders. PloS One 2014;9:e85268.
  28. Freedman DA. A note on screening regression equations. Am Statistician 1983;37:152-5.
  29. Leeflang MM, Moons KG, Reitsma JB, Zwinderman AH. Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions. Clin Chem 2008;54:729-37.
  30. Sherrington C, Lord SR, Close JC, Barraclough E, Taylor M, O'Rourke S, et al. A simple tool predicted probability of falling after aged care inpatient rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:779-86.
  31. Hooten WM, Rosenberg CJ, Eldrige JS, Qu W. Knee extensor strength is associated with pressure pain thresholds in adults with fibromyalgia. PloS One 2013;8:e59930.
  32. Meeus M, Nijs J, Huybrechts S, Truijen S. Evidence for gen- eralized hyperalgesia in chronic fatigue syndrome: a case control study. Clin Rheumatol 2010;29:393-8.
  33. Fingleton C, Smart K, Moloney N, Fullen BM, Doody C. Pain sensitization in people with knee osteoarthritis: a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015;23:1043-56.
  34. As-Sanie S, Harris RE, Harte SE, Tu FF, Neshewat G, Clauw DJ. Increased pressure pain sensitivity in women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:1047-55.
  35. Imamura M, Chen J, Matsubayashi SR, Targino RA, Alfieri FM, Bueno DK, et al. Changes in pressure pain threshold in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:2098-107.
  36. Zaman J, Vlaeyen JW, Van Oudenhove L, Wiech K, Van Diest I. Associative fear learning and perceptual discrimination: a perceptual pathway in the development of chronic pain. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2015;51:118-25.
  37. Tsay A, Allen TJ, Proske U, Giummarra MJ. Sensing the body in chronic pain: a review of psychophysical studies implicating altered body representation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2015;52:221-32.
  38. Ferrell WR, Tennant N, Baxendale RH, Kusel M, Sturrock RD. Musculoskeletal reflex function in the joint hypermobil- ity syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:1329-33.
  39. Smith TO, Jerman E, Easton V, Bacon H, Armon K, Poland F, et al. Do people with benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS) have reduced joint proprioception? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 2013;33:2709-16.
  40. Abeles AM, Pillinger MH, Solitar BM, Abeles M. Narrative review: the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:726-34.
  41. Fikree A, Grahame R, Aktar R, Farmer AD, Hakim AJ, Morris JK, et al. A prospective evaluation of undiagnosed joint hypermobility syndrome in patients with gastrointesti- nal symptoms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:1680-7.
  42. Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Madeleine P, Cuadrado ML, Ge HY, Arendt-Nielsen L, Pareja JA. Pressure pain sensitivity mapping of the temporalis muscle revealed bilateral pressure hyperalgesia in patients with strictly unilateral migraine. Cephalalgia 2009;29:670-6.

Authors
Scheper, M. C., Pacey, V., Rombaut, L., Adams, R. D., Tofts, L., Calders, P., Nicholson, L. L., & Engelbert, R. H. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU)
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-25
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
421-429
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-464X
  • 2151-4658
OpenAlex
W2501331378
Cited by
58
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arthritis Care & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (023.002.094)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type, hypermobility syndrome, pressure pain threshold, chronic pain, children, central sensitization, Beighton score, skin laxity, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Belgium, Biomechanical Phenomena, Child, Diagnosis, Differential, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Female, Humans, Hyperalgesia, Joint Instability, Joints, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, New South Wales, Pain Measurement, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Pain Threshold, Young Adult, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review