Cited by 13D Printing in Biomedical ResearchAcute Kidney Injury ResearchMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

Human kidney proximal tubule-microvascular model facilitates high-throughput analyses of structural and functional effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury

Shaughnessey, Erin M., Kann, Samuel H., Charest, Joseph L., Vedula, Else M.·2024·Advanced Biology

Abstract

Kidney ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) poses a major global healthcare burden, but effective treatments remain elusive. IRI involves a complex interplay of tissue‐level structural and functional changes caused by interruptions in blood and filtrate flow and reduced oxygenation. Existing in vitro models poorly replicate the in vivo injury environment and lack means of monitoring tissue function during the injury process. Here, a high‐throughput human primary kidney proximal tubule (PT)‐microvascular model is described, which facilitates in‐depth structural and rapid functional characterization of IRI‐induced changes in the tissue barrier. The PREDICT96 (P96) microfluidic platform's user‐controlled fluid flow can mimic the conditions of IR to induce pronounced changes in cell structure that resemble clinical and in vivo phenotypes. High‐throughput trans‐epi/endo‐thelial electrical resistance (TEER) sensing is applied to non‐invasively track functional changes in the PT‐microvascular barrier during the two‐stage injury process and over repeated episodes of injury. Notably, ischemia causes an initial increase in tissue TEER followed by a sudden increase in permeability upon reperfusion, and this biphasic response occurs only with the loss of both fluid flow and oxygenation. This study demonstrates the potential of the P96 kidney IRI model to enhance understanding of IRI and fuel therapeutic development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adbi.202300127

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaughnessey, E. M., Kann, S. H., Charest, J. L., & Vedula, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Draper Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Vedula, Else M.
Venue
Advanced Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-10-02
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
e2300127-e2300127
ISSN
2701-0198 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387296839
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1804845, 1842474)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Keywords
renal ischemia-reperfusion injury, proximal tubule, microfluidic model, transepithelial electrical resistance, endothelial permeability, high-throughput screening, oxygenation, fluid flow
MeSH terms
Humans, Kidney, Kidney Tubules, Proximal, Reperfusion Injury, Acute Kidney Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review