The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Molecular Weight and Annealing of Poly(3‐hexylthiophene)s on the Performance of Organic Field‐Effect Transistors
Abstract
The optical, structural, and electrical properties of thin layers made from poly(3‐hexylthiophene) (P3HT) samples of different molecular weights are presented. As reported in a previous paper by Kline et al., Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 1519, the mobilities of these layers are a strong function of the molecular weight, with the largest mobility found for the largest molecular weight. Atomic force microscopy studies reveal a complex polycrystalline morphology which changes considerably upon annealing. X‐ray studies show the occurrence of a layered phase for all P3HT fractions, especially after annealing at 150 °C. However, there is no clear correlation between the differences in the transport properties and the data from structural investigations. In order to reveal the processes limiting the mobility in these layers, the transistor properties were investigated as a function of temperature. The mobility decreases continuously with increasing temperatures; with the same trend pronounced thermochromic effects of the P3HT films occur. Apparently, the polymer chains adopt a more twisted, disordered conformation at higher temperatures, leading to interchain transport barriers. We conclude that the backbone conformation of the majority of the bulk material rather than the crystallinity of the layer is the most crucial parameter controlling the charge transport in these P3HT layers. This interpretation is supported by the significant blue‐shift of the solid‐state absorption spectra with decreasing molecular weight, which is indicative of a larger distortion of the P3HT backbone in the low‐molecular weight P3HT layers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dang, M. T., Hirsch, L., Wantz, G., & Wuest, J. D. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300005u · Cited by 587
Light Harvesting for Organic Photovoltaics
Hedley, G. J., Ruseckas, A., & Samuel, I. D. W. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00215 · Cited by 580
Steyrleuthner, R., Schubert, M., Howard, I., Klaumünzer, B., Schilling, K., Chen, Z., Saalfrank, P., Laquai, F., Facchetti, A., & Neher, D. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja306844f · Cited by 458
Self-citationKoch, F. P. V., Rivnay, J., Foster, S., Müller, C., Downing, J. M., Buchaca-Domingo, E., Westacott, P., Yu, L., Yuan, M., Baklar, M., et al. (2013) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.009 · Cited by 337
Go, G.-T., Lee, Y., Seo, D.-G., Pei, M., Lee, W., Yang, H., & Lee, T.-W. (2020) · Advanced Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/aisy.202000012 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Zen, A., Pflaum, J., Hirschmann, S., Zhuang, W., Jaiser, F., Asawapirom, U., Rabe, J. P., Scherf, U., & Neher, D.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 757-764
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2086922619
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Molecular Weight and Annealing of Poly(3‐hexylthiophene)s on the Performance of Organic Field‐Effect Transistors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.200400017
- The paper
- Zen, A., Pflaum, J., Hirschmann, S., Zhuang, W., Jaiser, F., Asawapirom, U., Rabe, J. P., Scherf, U., & Neher, D. (2004). Effect of Molecular Weight and Annealing of Poly(3‐hexylthiophene)s on the Performance of Organic Field‐Effect Transistors. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200400017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.