The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Energy of Charge‐Transfer States in Electron Donor–Acceptor Blends: Insight into the Energy Losses in Organic Solar Cells
Open accessAbstract
Here, a general experimental method to determine the energy ECT of intermolecular charge‐transfer (CT) states in electron donor–acceptor (D–A) blends from ground state absorption and electrochemical measurements is proposed. This CT energy is calibrated against the photon energy of maximum CT luminescence from selected D–A blends to correct for a constant Coulombic term. It is shown that ECT correlates linearly with the open‐circuit voltage (Voc) of photovoltaic devices in D–A blends via eVoc = ECT − 0.5 eV. Using the CT energy, it is found that photoinduced electron transfer (PET) from the lowest singlet excited state (S 1 with energy Eg) in the blend to the CT state (S 1 → CT) occurs when Eg − ECT > 0.1 eV. Additionally, it is shown that subsequent charge recombination from the CT state to the lowest triplet excited state (ET) of D or A (CT → T 1) can occur when ECT − ET > 0.1 eV. From these relations, it is concluded that in D–A blends optimized for photovoltaic action: i) the maximum attainable Voc is ultimately set by the optical band gap (eVoc = Eg − 0.6 eV) and ii) the singlet–triplet energy gap should be Δ EST < 0.2 eV to prevent recombination to the triplet state. These favorable conditions have not yet been met in conjugated materials and set the stage for further developments in this area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conjugated Polymer-Based Organic Solar Cells
Günes, S., Neugebauer, H., & Sariciftci, N. S. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050149z · Cited by 6,279
Cited by
Charge Photogeneration in Organic Solar Cells
Clarke, T. M., & Durrant, J. R. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900271s · Cited by 2,372
Characterization of nanostructured hybrid and organic solar cells by impedance spectroscopy
Fabregat-Santiago, F., Garcia-Belmonte, G., Mora-Seró, I., & Bisquert, J. (2011) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c0cp02249g · Cited by 1,206
Fused Nonacyclic Electron Acceptors for Efficient Polymer Solar Cells
Dai, S., Zhao, F., Zhang, Q., Lau, T.-K., Li, T., Liu, K., Ling, Q., Wang, C., Lu, X., You, W., et al. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b12755 · Cited by 864
Light Harvesting for Organic Photovoltaics
Hedley, G. J., Ruseckas, A., & Samuel, I. D. W. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00215 · Cited by 580
Yiu, A. T., Beaujuge, P. M., Lee, O. P., Woo, C. H., Toney, M. F., & Fréchet, J. M. J. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja2089662 · Cited by 491
Metadata
- Authors
- Veldman, D., Meskers, S. C. J., & Janssen, R. A. J.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1939-1948
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2164340598
- Cited by
- 977
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 55.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Energy of Charge‐Transfer States in Electron Donor–Acceptor Blends: Insight into the Energy Losses in Organic Solar Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.200900090
- The paper
- Veldman, D., Meskers, S. C. J., & Janssen, R. A. J. (2009). The Energy of Charge‐Transfer States in Electron Donor–Acceptor Blends: Insight into the Energy Losses in Organic Solar Cells. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200900090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.