Controlled synthesis and functionalization of ordered large-pore mesoporous carbons
Abstract
Abstract Ordered mesoporous carbon C‐FDU‐18s with tunable pore sizes of 12−33 nm and pore wall thicknesses of 5−11 nm were synthesized by using poly(ethylene oxide)‐block‐poly(styrene) (PEO‐b‐PS) diblock copolymers with various PS chain lengths as templates and through the evaporation induced self‐assembly process. The obtained C‐FDU‐18 carbons possess face‐centered cubic mesostructure with Fm3m symmetry, large cell parameters varying from 32 to 54 nm, high Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area up to 1000 m2 g−1 and large pore volume of about 0.7 cm3 g−1. By oxidative treatment of HNO3 and H2O2 mixed solution, numerous hydrophilic groups were created in the mesopore channels without destroying the ordered mesostructure of the C‐FDU‐18. Through the in situ reduction of Ag+, Ag nanoparticles (9.7 nm) were successfully introduced into the large mesopores, resulting in functional mesoporous carbons Ag–C‐FDU‐18 with stably trapped Ag nanoparticles. Similarly, by reduction of Fe3+ ions in the large mesopores, superparamagnetic Fe–C‐FDU‐18 with incorporated magnetic nanoparticles (6.2 nm) and fast magnetic response was synthesized. These functional large‐pore mesoporous carbons have high potential for application in various fields such as catalysis, chemical sensing, and magnetic separation and enrichment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Thick pore walls are favorable because of the possibility for further modification on the pore surface.
“Thick pore walls are also favorable because of the possibility for further modification on the pore surface [151,155].”
From Block Copolymers: Synthesis, Self-Assembly, and Applications (2017) · cites this paper as [155]
Larger pore size allows the loading of metal catalyst particles.
“Larger pore size facilitates a more efficient diffusion of guest molecules within the pores [136], and also allows the loading of metal catalyst particles [154,155].”
From Block Copolymers: Synthesis, Self-Assembly, and Applications (2017) · cites this paper as [155]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 139
- Authors
- Deng, Y., Cai, Y., Sun, Z., Gu, D., Wei, J., Li, W., Guo, X., Yang, J., & Zhao, D.
- Affiliations
- Fudan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Dongyuan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 3658-3665
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2118963444
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
- Keywords
- ordered mesoporous carbon, evaporation-induced self-assembly, tunable pore size, pore wall thickness, silver nanoparticles, iron nanoparticles, magnetic separation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review