The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strain Anisotropies and Self‐Limiting Capacities in Single‐Crystalline 3D Silicon Microstructures: Models for High Energy Density Lithium‐Ion Battery Anodes
Abstract
This study examines the crystallographic anisotropy of strain evolution in model, single‐crystalline silicon anode microstructures on electrochemical intercalation of lithium atoms. The 3D hierarchically patterned single‐ crystalline silicon microstructures used as model anodes were prepared using combined methods of photolithography and anisotropic dry and wet chemical etching. Silicon anodes, which possesses theoretically ten times the energy density by weight compared to conventional carbon anodes, reveal highly anisotropic but more importantly, variably recoverable crystallographic strains during cycling. Model strain‐limiting silicon anode architectures that mitigate these impacts are highlighted. By selecting a specific design for the silicon anode microstructure, and exploiting the crystallographic anisotropy of strain evolution upon lithium intercalation to control the direction of volumetric expansion, the volume available for expansion and thus the charging capacity of these structures can be broadly varied. We highlight exemplary design rules for this self‐strain‐limited charging in which an anode can be variably optimized between capacity and stability. Strain‐limited capacities ranging from 677 mAhg−1 to 2833 mAhg−1 were achieved by constraining the area available for volumetric expansion via the design rules of the microstructures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alternative energy technologies
Dresselhaus, M. S., & Thomas, I. L. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35104599 · Cited by 4,894
A realizable renewable energy future
Turner, J. A. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5428.687 · Cited by 1,642
Cited by
Thackeray, M. M., Wolverton, C., & Isaacs, E. D. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21892e · Cited by 2,515
Electrode Degradation in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Pender, J. P., Jha, G., Youn, D. H., Ziegler, J. M., Andoni, I., Choi, E. J., Heller, A., Dunn, B. S., Weiss, P. S., Penner, R. M., et al. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b04365 · Cited by 873
Visualization and Quantification of Electrochemical and Mechanical Degradation in Li Ion Batteries
Ebner, M., Marone, F., Stampanoni, M., & Wood, V. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1241882 · Cited by 695
In situ atomic-scale imaging of electrochemical lithiation in silicon
Liu, X. H., Wang, J. W., Huang, S., Fan, F., Huang, X., Liu, Y., Krylyuk, S., Yoo, J., Dayeh, S. A., Davydov, A. V., et al. (2012) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.170 · Cited by 657
Two-Phase Electrochemical Lithiation in Amorphous Silicon
Wang, J. W., He, Y., Fan, F., Liu, X. H., Xia, S., Liu, Y., Harris, C. T., Li, H., Huang, J. Y., Mao, S. X., et al. (2013) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl304379k · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldman, J. L., Long, B. R., Gewirth, A. A., & Nuzzo, R. G.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2412-2422
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2085384469
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strain Anisotropies and Self‐Limiting Capacities in Single‐Crystalline 3D Silicon Microstructures: Models for High Energy Density Lithium‐Ion Battery Anodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201002487
- The paper
- Goldman, J. L., Long, B. R., Gewirth, A. A., & Nuzzo, R. G. (2011). Strain Anisotropies and Self‐Limiting Capacities in Single‐Crystalline 3D Silicon Microstructures: Models for High Energy Density Lithium‐Ion Battery Anodes. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201002487
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.