The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimal Size of Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study
Abstract
Progress in the prediction and optimization of the heating of magnetic nanoparticles in an alternating magnetic field is highly desirable for their application in magnetic hyperthermia. Here, a model system consisting of metallic iron nanoparticles with a size ranging from 5.5 to 28 nm is extensively studied. Their properties depend strongly on their size: behaviors typical of single‐domain particles in the superparamagnetic regime, in the ferromagnetic regime, and of multi‐domain particles are observed. Ferromagnetic single‐domain nanoparticles are the best candidates and display the highest specific losses reported in the literature so far (11.2 ± 1 mJ g−1). Measurements are analysed using recently a demonstrated analytical formula and numerical simulations of the hysteresis loops. Several features expected theoretically are observed for the first time experimentally: i) the correlation between the nanoparticle diameter and their coercive field, ii) the correlation between the amplitude of the coercive field and the losses, and iii) the variation of the optimal size with the amplitude of the magnetic field. None of these features are predicted by the linear response theory – generally used to interpret hyperthermia experiments – but are a natural consequence of theories deriving from the Stoner–Wohlfarth model; they also appear clearly in numerical simulations. These results open the path to a more accurate description, prediction, and analysis of magnetic hyperthermia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comprehensive understanding of magnetic hyperthermia for improving antitumor therapeutic efficacy
Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, W., Li, G., Ma, X., Zhang, Y., Chen, S., Tiwari, S., Shi, K., et al. (2020) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.40805 · Cited by 719
Organic Phase Syntheses of Magnetic Nanoparticles and Their Applications
Wu, L., Mendoza-Garcia, A., Li, Q., & Sun, S. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00687 · Cited by 601
de la Presa, P., Luengo, Y., Multigner, M., Costo, R., Morales, M. P., Rivero, G., & Hernando, A. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp310771p · Cited by 317
Multiplying Magnetic Hyperthermia Response by Nanoparticle Assembling
Serantes, D., Simeonidis, K., Angelakeris, M., Chubykalo-Fesenko, O., Marciello, M., Morales, M. D. P., Baldomir, D., & Martinez-Boubeta, C. (2014) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp410717m · Cited by 281
Use of magnetic fields and nanoparticles to trigger drug release and improve tumor targeting
Liu, J. F., Jang, B., Issadore, D., & Tsourkas, A. (2019) · WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1002/wnan.1571 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Mehdaoui, B., Meffre, A., Carrey, J., Lachaize, S., Lacroix, L., Gougeon, M., Chaudret, B., & Respaud, M.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-10-19
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 4573-4581
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W1974662965
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Size of Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201101243
- The paper
- Mehdaoui, B., Meffre, A., Carrey, J., Lachaize, S., Lacroix, L., Gougeon, M., Chaudret, B., & Respaud, M. (2011). Optimal Size of Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201101243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.