The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visualizing MOF Mixed Matrix Membranes at the Nanoscale: Towards Structure‐Performance Relationships in CO2/CH4 Separation Over NH2‐MIL‐53(Al)@PI
Open accessAbstract
Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) composed of metal organic framework (MOF) fillers embedded in a polymeric matrix represent a promising alternative for CO 2 removal from natural gas and biogas. Here, MMMs based on NH 2‐MIL‐53(Al) MOF and polyimide are successfully synthesized with MOF loadings up to 25 wt% and different thicknesses. At 308 K and ΔP = 3 bar, the incorporation of the MOF filler enhances CO 2 permeability with respect to membranes based on the neat polymer, while preserving the relatively high separation factor. The rate of solvent evaporation after membrane casting proves key for the final configuration and dispersion of the MOF in the membrane. Fast solvent removal favours the contraction of the MOF structure to its narrow pore framework configuration, resulting in enhanced separation factor and, particularly, CO 2 permeability. The study reveals an excellent filler‐polymer contact, with ca. 0.11% void volume fraction, for membranes based on the amino‐functionalized MOF, even at high filler loadings (25 wt%). By providing precise and quantitative insight into key structural features at the nanoscale range, the approach provides feedback to the membrane casting process and therefore it represents an important advancement towards the rational design of mixed matrix membranes with enhanced structural features and separation performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Amine-Functionalized MIL-53 Metal−Organic Framework with Large Separation Power for CO 2 and CH 4
Couck, S., Denayer, J. F. M., Baron, G. V., Rémy, T., Gascon, J., & Kapteijn, F. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja900555r · Cited by 988
Self-citation
Cited by
Rezakazemi, M., Ebadi Amooghin, A., Montazer-Rahmati, M. M., Ismail, A. F., & Matsuura, T. (2014) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.01.003 · Cited by 853
Yang, L., Qian, S., Wang, X., Cui, X., Chen, B., & Xing, H. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00756c · Cited by 746
Zhu, L., Zong, L., Wu, X., Li, M., Wang, H., You, J., & Li, C. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b00566 · Cited by 455
Advanced Porous Materials in Mixed Matrix Membranes
Cheng, Y., Ying, Y., Japip, S., Jiang, S., Chung, T., Zhang, S., & Zhao, D. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201802401 · Cited by 448
Xie, K., Fu, Q., Qiao, G. G., & Webley, P. A. (2019) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.049 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodenas, T., van Dalen, M., García‐Pérez, E., Serra‐Crespo, P., Zornoza, B., Kapteijn, F., & Gascon, J.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-03-14
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-256
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2165262541
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 43.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visualizing MOF Mixed Matrix Membranes at the Nanoscale: Towards Structure‐Performance Relationships in CO2/CH4 Separation Over NH2‐MIL‐53(Al)@PI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201203462
- The paper
- Rodenas, T., van Dalen, M., García‐Pérez, E., Serra‐Crespo, P., Zornoza, B., Kapteijn, F., & Gascon, J. (2014). Visualizing MOF Mixed Matrix Membranes at the Nanoscale: Towards Structure‐Performance Relationships in CO2/CH4 Separation Over NH2‐MIL‐53(Al)@PI. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201203462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.