The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nongeminate and Geminate Recombination in PTB7:PCBM Solar Cells
Open accessAbstract
A combination of transient photovoltage (TPV), voltage dependent charge extraction (CE), and time delayed collection field (TDCF) measurements is applied to poly[[4,8‐bis[(2‐ethylhexyl)oxy]benzo[1,2‐b:4,5‐b']dithiophene‐2,6‐diyl] [3‐fluoro‐2‐[(2‐ethylhexyl)carbonyl] thieno[3,4‐b]thiophenediyl]] (PTB7):[6,6]‐phenyl‐C71‐butyric acid (PC 71 BM) bulk heterojunction solar cells to analyze the limitations of photovoltaic performance. Devices are processed from pure chlorobenzene (CB) solution and a subset is optimized with 1,8‐diiodooctane (DIO) as co‐solvent. The dramatic changes in device performance are discussed with respect to the dominating loss processes. While in the devices processed from CB solution severe geminate and nongeminate recombination is observed, the use of DIO facilitates efficient polaron pair dissociation and minimizes geminate recombination. Thus, from the determined charge carrier decay rate under open circuit conditions and the voltage dependent charge carrier densities n(V), the nongeminate loss current Jloss of the samples with DIO alone enables the reconstruction of the current/voltage (j/V) characteristics across the whole operational voltage range. Geminate and nongeminate losses are considered to describe the j/V response of cells prepared without additive, but lead to a clearly overestimated device performance. The deviation between measured and reconstructed j/V characteristics is attributed to trapped charges in isolated domains of pure fullerene phases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Light Harvesting for Organic Photovoltaics
Hedley, G. J., Ruseckas, A., & Samuel, I. D. W. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00215 · Cited by 580
Understanding Low Bandgap Polymer PTB7 and Optimizing Polymer Solar Cells Based on It
Lu, L., & Yu, L. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201400384 · Cited by 506
Bulk‐Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells: Five Core Technologies for Their Commercialization
Kang, H., Kim, G., Kim, J., Kwon, S., Kim, H., & Lee, K. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201601197 · Cited by 489
Efficient Organic Solar Cells with Helical Perylene Diimide Electron Acceptors
Zhong, Y., Trinh, M. T., Chen, R., Wang, W., Khlyabich, P. P., Kumar, B., Xu, Q., Nam, C.-Y., Sfeir, M. Y., Black, C., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja5092613 · Cited by 434
He, X., Mukherjee, S., Watkins, S., Chen, M., Qin, T., Thomsen, L., Ade, H., & McNeill, C. R. (2014) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp501222w · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Foertig, A., Kniepert, J., Gluecker, M., Brenner, T., Dyakonov, V., Neher, D., & Deibel, C.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-09-17
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1306-1311
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2021876790
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nongeminate and Geminate Recombination in PTB7:PCBM Solar Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201302134
- The paper
- Foertig, A., Kniepert, J., Gluecker, M., Brenner, T., Dyakonov, V., Neher, D., & Deibel, C. (2014). Nongeminate and Geminate Recombination in PTB7:PCBM Solar Cells. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201302134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.