Cited by 71Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringSilk-based biomaterials and applicationsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Film‐Based Implants for Supporting Neuron–Electrode Integrated Interfaces for The Brain

Open access
Tang‐Schomer, Min D., Hu, Xiao, Hronik‐Tupaj, Marie, Tien, Lee W., Whalen, Michael J., Omenetto, Fiorenzo G., Kaplan, David L.·2014·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

Neural engineering provides promise for cell therapy by integrating the host brain with brain–machine‐interface technologies in order to externally modulate functions. Long‐term interfaces with the host brain remain a critical challenge due to insufficient graft cell survivability and loss of brain electrode sensitivity over time. Here, integrated neuron–electrode interfaces are developed on thin flexible and transparent silk films as brain implants. Mechanical properties and surface topography of silk films are optimized to promote cell survival and alignment of primary rat cortical cells. Compartmentalized neural cultures and co‐patterned electrode arrays are incorporated on the silk films with built‐in wire connections. Electrical stimulation via electrodes embedded in the films activated surrounding neurons to produce evoked calcium responses. In mice brains, silk film implants show conformal contact capable of modulating host brain cells with minimal inflammatory response and stable indwelling for weeks. The approach of combining cell therapy and brain electrodes could provide sustained functional interfaces with ex vivo control with spatial precision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201303196

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang‐Schomer, M. D., Hu, X., Hronik‐Tupaj, M., Tien, L. W., Whalen, M. J., Omenetto, F. G., & Kaplan, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Rowan University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kaplan, David L.
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-11-18
Volume
24
Issue
13
Pages
1938-1948
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W2075603965
Cited by
71
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS061255)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR061988)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P41EB002520)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
silk films, neural implants, brain-computer interface, transparent flexible films, cell alignment, electrical stimulation, calcium response, neuroinflammation, cell therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review