The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improved Photocatalytic Performance of Heterojunction by Controlling the Contact Facet: High Electron Transfer Capacity between TiO2 and the {110} Facet of BiVO4 Caused by Suitable Energy Band Alignment
Abstract
Charge separation at the interface of heterojunctions is affected by the energy band alignments of the materials that compose the heterojunctions. Controlling the contact crystal facets can lead to different energy band alignments owing to the varied electronic structures of the different crystal facets. Therefore, BiVO 4‐TiO 2 heterojunctions are designed with different BiVO 4 crystal facets at the interface ({110} facet or {010} facet), named BiVO 4‐110‐TiO 2 and BiVO 4‐010‐TiO 2, respectively, to achieve high photocatalytic performance. Higher photocurrent density and lower photoluminescence intensity are observed with the BiVO 4‐110‐TiO 2 heterojunction than those of the BiVO 4‐010‐TiO 2 heterojunction, which confirms that the former possesses higher charge carrier separation capacity than the latter. The photocatalytic degradation results of both Rhodamine B and 4‐nonylphenol demonstrate that better photocatalytic performance is achieved on the BiVO 4‐110‐TiO 2 heterojunction than the BiVO 4‐010‐TiO 2 heterojunction under visible light (≥422 nm) irradiation. The higher electron transfer capacity and better photocatalytic performance of the BiVO 4‐110‐TiO 2 heterojunction are attributed to the more fluent electron transfer from the {110} facet of BiVO 4 to TiO 2 caused by the smaller interfacial energy barrier. This is further confirmed by the selective deposition of Pt on the TiO 2 surface as well as the longer lifetime of Bi 5+ in the BiVO 4‐110‐TiO 2 heterojunction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ong, W.-J., Tan, L.-L., Ng, Y. H., Yong, S.-T., & Chai, S.-P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075 · Cited by 7,147
Tan, H. L., Amal, R., & Ng, Y. H. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta04441k · Cited by 459
Facet‐Engineered Surface and Interface Design of Photocatalytic Materials
Bai, S., Wang, L., Li, Z., & Xiong, Y. (2017) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201600216 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, H., Yu, H., Quan, X., Chen, S., & Zhao, H.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-07
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 3074-3080
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W1999871385
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Photocatalytic Performance of Heterojunction by Controlling the Contact Facet: High Electron Transfer Capacity between TiO2 and the {110} Facet of BiVO4 Caused by Suitable Energy Band Alignment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201500521
- The paper
- Li, H., Yu, H., Quan, X., Chen, S., & Zhao, H. (2015). Improved Photocatalytic Performance of Heterojunction by Controlling the Contact Facet: High Electron Transfer Capacity between TiO2 and the {110} Facet of BiVO4 Caused by Suitable Energy Band Alignment. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201500521
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.