Cited by 1,388Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques

Hierarchical NiCo2S4 Nanowire Arrays Supported on Ni Foam: An Efficient and Durable Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Oxygen and Hydrogen Evolution Reactions

Sivanantham, Arumugam, Ganesan, Pandian, Shanmugam, Sangaraju·2016·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

A recent approach for solar‐to‐hydrogen generation has been water electrolysis using efficient, stable, and inexpensive bifunctional electrocatalysts within strong electrolytes. Herein, the direct growth of 1D NiCo 2 S 4 nanowire (NW) arrays on a 3D Ni foam (NF) is described. This NiCo 2 S 4 NW/NF array functions as an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting with excellent activity and stability. The 3D‐Ni foam facilitates the directional growth, exposing more active sites of the catalyst for electrochemical reactions at the electrode–electrolyte interface. The binder‐free, self‐made NiCo 2 S 4 NW/NF electrode delivers a hydrogen production current density of 10 mA cm–2 at an overpotential of 260 mV for the oxygen evolution reaction and at 210 mV (versus a reversible hydrogen electrode) for the hydrogen evolution reaction in 1 m KOH. This highly active and stable bifunctional electrocatalyst enables the preparation of an alkaline water electrolyzer that could deliver 10 mA cm–2 under a cell voltage of 1.63 V. Because the nonprecious‐metal NiCo 2 S 4 NW/NF foam‐based electrodes afford the vigorous and continuous evolution of both H 2 and O 2 at 1.68 V, generated using a solar panel, they appear to be promising water splitting devices for large‐scale solar‐to‐hydrogen generation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201600566

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 1,388

Authors
Sivanantham, A., Ganesan, P., & Shanmugam, S.
Affiliations
Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Shanmugam, Sangaraju
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04-09
Volume
26
Issue
26
Pages
4661-4672
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W2314593214
Cited by
1,388
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 141 · 2021: 155 · 2020: 206 · 2019: 213 · 2018: 195 · 2017: 142 · 2016: 17
FWCI
51.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (16‐ RS‐04)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Keywords
nickel foam, bifunctional electrocatalysts, oxygen evolution reaction, hydrogen evolution reaction, overall water splitting, alkaline electrolyzer, solar hydrogen production, non-noble metal catalysts, binder-free electrodes, directional growth, hydrogen production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review