The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stabilization of Single Metal Atoms on Graphitic Carbon Nitride
Open accessAbstract
Graphitic carbon nitride (g‐C 3 N 4) exhibits unique properties as a support for single‐atom heterogeneous catalysts (SAHCs). Understanding how the synthesis method, carrier properties, and metal identity impact the isolation of metal centers is essential to guide their design. This study compares the effectiveness of direct and postsynthetic routes to prepare SAHCs by incorporating palladium, silver, iridium, platinum, or gold in g‐C 3 N 4 of distinct morphology (bulk, mesoporous and exfoliated). The speciation (single atoms, dimers, clusters, or nanoparticles), distribution, and oxidation state of the supported metals are characterized by multiple techniques including extensive use of aberration‐corrected electron microscopy. SAHCs are most readily attained via direct approaches applying copolymerizable metal precursors and employing high surface area carriers. In contrast, although post‐synthetic routes enable improved control over the metal loading, nanoparticle formation is more prevalent. Comparison of the carrier morphologies also points toward the involvement of defects in stabilizing single atoms. The distinct metal dispersions are rationalized by density functional theory and kinetic Monte Carlo simulations, highlighting the interplay between the adsorption energetics and diffusion kinetics. Evaluation in the continuous three‐phase semihydrogenation of 1‐hexyne identifies controlling the metal–carrier interaction and exposing the metal sites at the surface layer as key challenges in designing efficient SAHCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Spiers Memorial Lecture : Role of perimeter interfaces in catalysis by gold nanoparticles
Haruta, M. (2011) · Faraday Discussions · doi:10.1039/c1fd00107h · Cited by 282
Cited by
Chemical Synthesis of Single Atomic Site Catalysts
Ji, S., Chen, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, Z., Wang, D., & Li, Y. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00818 · Cited by 1,444
Single-Atom Catalysts across the Periodic Table
Kaiser, S. K., Chen, Z., Faust Akl, D., Mitchell, S., & Pérez-Ramírez, J. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00576 · Cited by 1,367
Self-citationChai, W. S., Cheun, J. Y., Kumar, P. S., Mubashir, M., Majeed, Z., Banat, F., Ho, S.-H., & Show, P. L. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126589 · Cited by 1,275
Bridging homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis by heterogeneous single-metal-site catalysts
Cui, X., Li, W., Ryabchuk, P., Junge, K., & Beller, M. (2018) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-018-0090-9 · Cited by 1,119
Liu, L., & Corma, A. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00733 · Cited by 689
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Z., Mitchell, S., Vorobyeva, E., Leary, R. K., Hauert, R., Furnival, T., Ramasse, Q. M., Thomas, J. M., Midgley, P. A., Dontsova, D., Antonietti, M., Pogodin, S., López, N., & Pérez‐Ramírez, J.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01-13
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2571806585
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stabilization of Single Metal Atoms on Graphitic Carbon Nitride. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201605785
- The paper
- Chen, Z., Mitchell, S., Vorobyeva, E., Leary, R. K., Hauert, R., Furnival, T., Ramasse, Q. M., Thomas, J. M., Midgley, P. A., Dontsova, D., Antonietti, M., Pogodin, S., López, N., & Pérez‐Ramírez, J. (2017). Stabilization of Single Metal Atoms on Graphitic Carbon Nitride. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201605785
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.