Cited by 375Phase Change Materials ResearchThermal properties of materialsAdsorption and Cooling Systems

Thermally Conductive Phase Change Composites Featuring Anisotropic Graphene Aerogels for Real‐Time and Fast‐Charging Solar‐Thermal Energy Conversion

Min, Peng, Liu, Jie, Li, Xiaofeng, An, Fei, Liu, Pengfei, Shen, Yuxia, Koratkar, Nikhil, Yu, Zhong‐Zhen·2018·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

Phase change materials (PCMs) have triggered considerable attention as candidates for solar‐thermal energy conversion. However, their intrinsic low thermal conductivity prevents the rapid spreading of heat into the interior of the PCM, causing low efficiencies in energy storage/release. Herein, anisotropic and lightweight high‐quality graphene aerogels are developed by directionally freezing aqueous suspensions of polyamic acid salt and graphene oxide to form vertically aligned monoliths, followed by freeze‐drying, imidization at 300 °C and graphitization at 2800 °C. After impregnating with paraffin wax, the resultant phase change composite (PCC) exhibits a high transversal thermal conductivity of 2.68 W m −1 K −1 and an even higher longitudinal thermal conductivity of 8.87 W m −1 K −1 with an exceptional latent heat retention of 98.7%. When subjected to solar radiation, solar energy is converted to heat at the exposed surface of the PCC. As a result of the PCC's high thermal conductivity in the thickness direction, heat can spread readily into the interior of the PCC enabling a small temperature gradient of <3.0 K cm −1 and a fast charging feature. These results demonstrate the potential for real‐time and fast‐charging solar‐thermal energy conversion using phase change materials with tailored anisotropy in their thermal properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201805365

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Paraffin/anisotropic graphene aerogel composite PCMs have thermal conductivities of 2.68 W mK−1 along the transverse direction and 8.87 W mK−1 along the longitudinal direction, about 24 times higher than pure paraffin.

    “After infiltrating paraffin, the thermal conductivity values of the resultant paraffin/AGAs composite PCMs were 2.68 W mK−1 along the transverse direction and 8.87 W mK−1 along the longitudinal direction, which was ≈24 times higher than that of pure paraffin.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 375

Authors
Min, P., Liu, J., Li, X., An, F., Liu, P., Shen, Y., Koratkar, N., & Yu, Z.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composite Materials (CN)
  • Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN)
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Xiaofeng
  • Yu, Zhong‐Zhen
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-24
Volume
28
Issue
51
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W2898230349
Cited by
375
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 1
FWCI
20.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51402012, 51533001)
  • State Key Laboratory of Organic–Inorganic Composites (201404)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Phase Change Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
Keywords
phase change materials, graphene aerogel, anisotropic thermal conductivity, solar thermal conversion, latent heat storage, alkanes, freeze casting, freeze-drying, imidization, graphitization, fast charging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review