The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Heteroatom Doped Materials for Advanced Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
High theoretical capacity and high energy density make lithium sulfur (Li‐S) batteries a competitive candidate for next‐generation energy storage systems. However, achieving the practical application of Li‐S batteries is still a huge challenge due to some inevitable obstacles. Poor conductivity of active sulfur, large volume expansion of cathode, and severe shuttle effect of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) greatly limit the capacity of cells and lead to unsatisfied cycle performance. Therefore, various sulfur host materials have been proposed and investigated, which should possess good conductivity, porous structure, and strong immobilization capability for LiPSs. Unfortunately, it is incompetent to cover all the advantages mentioned above for pristine materials. Heteroatom doping fundamentally manipulates the electronic structure and polarity of materials, leading to some unprecedented properties, and subsequent enhancement in electrochemical performance. This review systematically summarizes the recent progress of heteroatom (metal single atom and non‐metal atom) doping in various materials including carbon materials, graphitic carbon nitride (g‐C 3 N 4), and metal compounds as the ideal sulfur host. Furthermore, the relationship between the unique features of sulfur host materials originated from heteroatom doping and enhanced performance of cells is comprehensively discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The chemistry of graphene oxide
Dreyer, D. R., Park, S., Bielawski, C. W., & Ruoff, R. S. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b917103g · Cited by 11,653
High-Performance Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Derived from Polyaniline, Iron, and Cobalt
Wu, G., More, K. L., Johnston, C. M., & Zelenay, P. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200832 · Cited by 3,984
Hou, J., Cao, C., Idrees, F., & Ma, X. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn506394r · Cited by 1,529
Liu, H., Hu, Z., Liu, Q., Sun, P., Wang, Y., Chou, S., Hu, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d0ta09538a · Cited by 176
Cited by
Designing a Built-In Electric Field for Efficient Energy Electrocatalysis
Zhao, X., Liu, M., Wang, Y., Xiong, Y., Yang, P., Qin, J., Xiong, X., & Lei, Y. (2022) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c09888 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., & Han, W.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-10-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W3206169623
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Heteroatom Doped Materials for Advanced Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.202107166
- The paper
- Wang, J., & Han, W. (2022). A Review of Heteroatom Doped Materials for Advanced Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202107166
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.