Cited by 145Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsIron oxide chemistry and applications

Atomic‐Level Surface Engineering of Nickel Phosphide Nanoarrays for Efficient Electrocatalytic Water Splitting at Large Current Density

Lv, Xinding, Wan, Shutong, Mou, Tianyou, Han, Xue, Zhang, Yifan, Wang, Zilong, Tao, Xia·2023·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

Designing high‐performance and cost‐effective electrocatalysts for water splitting at high current density is pivotal for practical industrial applications. Herein, it is found that atomic‐level surface engineering of self‐supported nickel phosphide (NiP) nanoarrays via a facile cation‐exchange method can substantially regulate the chemical and physical properties of catalysts by introducing Co atoms. Such surface‐engineered Ni x Co 1–x P endows several aspects of merits: i) rough nanosheet array electrode structure accessible to diffusion of electrolytes and release of gas bubbles, ii) enriched P vacancies companied by Co doping and thus increased active sites, and iii) the synergy of Ni 5 P 4 and NiP 2 beneficial to catalytic activity enhancement. By virtue of finely controlling the Co contents, the optimal Ni 0.96 Co 0.04 P electrode achieves remarkable bifunctional electrocatalytic performance for overall water splitting at a large current density of 1000 mA cm−2, showing overpotentials of 249.7 mV for hydrogen evolution reaction and 281.7 mV for oxygen evolution reaction. Furthermore, the Ni 0.96 Co 0.04 P electrode at 500 mA cm−2 exhibits an ultralow potential (1.71 V) and ultralong durability (500 h) for overall water splitting. This study implies that the atomic‐level surface engineering of the electrode materials offers a viable route for gaining high‐performance catalysts for water splitting at large current density.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.202205161

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 145

Authors
Lv, X., Wan, S., Mou, T., Han, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., & Tao, X.
Affiliations
  • Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Tao, Xia
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-11-30
Volume
33
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W4310433402
Cited by
145
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 23
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (22176011)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Iron oxide chemistry and applications
Keywords
nickel phosphide, cobalt doping, cation exchange, phosphorus vacancies, bifunctional electrocatalysts, overall water splitting, hydrogen evolution reaction, oxygen evolution reaction, high current density, binder-free electrodes, nanosheet arrays, catalyst stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review