Structural Defects in Phase‐Regulated High‐Entropy Oxides toward Superior Microwave Absorption Properties
Abstract
High‐entropy (HE) oxides have become increasingly popular as electromagnetic wave‐absorbing materials owing to their customizable structure and unique HE effects. However, the weak loss property of single‐phase HE ceramics and the approaches implemented to improve them based on semi‐empirical rules severely limit their development. Herein, two biphasic HE oxides are prepared by simple sintering to realize accurate regulation of crystal phases and structural defects. It is verified that HE effects cause various defects that are beneficial for microwave dissipation within complex‐phase ceramics. In spinel/perovskite HE oxides, around the interface of spinel (111) and perovskite (110) planes, notable stress concentrations and lattice distortions are directly observed, inducing numerous point defects and stacking faults. Interestingly, besides the existing heterogeneous interface of rock salt (220)/spinel (220) plane and defects, rock salt/spinel HE oxides enabled synergistic effects via the precise regulation of components’ phase. Driven by structural defects and multi‐phases in HE complexes, the intense polarization is evidently found, confirmed by the first‐principles calculations. Accordingly, the two complex‐phase HE oxides demonstrate excellent microwave absorption performance, and the minimal reflection loss of −54.5 dB is achieved. Therefore, this study provides valuable guidelines for the design of microwave absorbers using HE oxides.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Plenty of lattice defects (point defects, line defects, surface defects, and deformation twining) are observed on the surfaces of the as-prepared Au81Pd2Pt9-S8B4.6A3.4 aerogels.
“there”
From Realization of Au81Pd2Pt9-S8B4.6A3.4 aerogels as superior catalysts toward HER and ORR by synergism of coarse and fine tuning d-band center of Pt (2023) · cites this paper as [40]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 493
- Authors
- Zhao, B., Du, Y., Yan, Z., Rao, L., Chen, G., Yuan, M., Yang, L., Zhang, J., & Che, R.
- Affiliations
- Fudan University (CN)
- Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics (CN)
- Zhejiang Lab (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Che, Renchao
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-10-27
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W4307650044
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 71 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 178 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 24.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (52231007, 51725101, 11727807, 61790581, 22088101, 52271167)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › High Entropy Alloys Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis
- Keywords
- high-entropy oxides, microwave absorption, structural defects, phase regulation, stacking faults, point defects, lattice distortion, polarization, reflection loss, sintering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review