Cited by 493Electromagnetic wave absorption materialsHigh Entropy Alloys StudiesMicrowave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis

Structural Defects in Phase‐Regulated High‐Entropy Oxides toward Superior Microwave Absorption Properties

Zhao, Biao, Du, Yiqian, Yan, Zhikan, Rao, Longjun, Chen, Guanyu, Yuan, Mingyue, Yang, Liting, Zhang, Jincang +1 more·2023·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

High‐entropy (HE) oxides have become increasingly popular as electromagnetic wave‐absorbing materials owing to their customizable structure and unique HE effects. However, the weak loss property of single‐phase HE ceramics and the approaches implemented to improve them based on semi‐empirical rules severely limit their development. Herein, two biphasic HE oxides are prepared by simple sintering to realize accurate regulation of crystal phases and structural defects. It is verified that HE effects cause various defects that are beneficial for microwave dissipation within complex‐phase ceramics. In spinel/perovskite HE oxides, around the interface of spinel (111) and perovskite (110) planes, notable stress concentrations and lattice distortions are directly observed, inducing numerous point defects and stacking faults. Interestingly, besides the existing heterogeneous interface of rock salt (220)/spinel (220) plane and defects, rock salt/spinel HE oxides enabled synergistic effects via the precise regulation of components’ phase. Driven by structural defects and multi‐phases in HE complexes, the intense polarization is evidently found, confirmed by the first‐principles calculations. Accordingly, the two complex‐phase HE oxides demonstrate excellent microwave absorption performance, and the minimal reflection loss of −54.5 dB is achieved. Therefore, this study provides valuable guidelines for the design of microwave absorbers using HE oxides.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.202209924

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 493

Authors
Zhao, B., Du, Y., Yan, Z., Rao, L., Chen, G., Yuan, M., Yang, L., Zhang, J., & Che, R.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics (CN)
  • Zhejiang Lab (CN)
Corresponding author
Che, Renchao
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-10-27
Volume
33
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W4307650044
Cited by
493
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 178 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 2
FWCI
24.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (52231007, 51725101, 11727807, 61790581, 22088101, 52271167)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › High Entropy Alloys Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis
Keywords
high-entropy oxides, microwave absorption, structural defects, phase regulation, stacking faults, point defects, lattice distortion, polarization, reflection loss, sintering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review