The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Limitations of the Tauc Plot Method
Open accessAbstract
The Tauc plot is a method originally developed to derive the optical gap of amorphous semiconductors such as amorphous germanium or silicon. By measuring the absorption coefficient α(hν) and plotting versus photon energy hν, a value for the optical gap (Tauc gap) is determined. In this way non‐direct optical transitions between approximately parabolic bands can be examined. In the last decades, a modification of this method for (poly‐) crystalline semiconductors has become popular to study direct and indirect interband transitions. For this purpose, (ahν)n (n = , 2) is plotted against hν to determine a value of the electronic bandgap. Due to the ease of performing UV–vis measurements, this method has nowadays become a standard to analyze various (poly‐) crystalline solids, regardless of their different electronic structure. Although this leads partially to widely varying values of the respective bandgap of nominally identical materials, there is still no study that critically questions which peculiarities in the electronic structure prevent a use of the Tauc plot for (poly‐) crystalline solids and to which material classes this applies. This study aims to close this gap by discussing the Tauc plot and its limiting factors for exemplary (poly‐) crystalline solids with different electronic structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films
O'Regan, B., & Grätzel, M. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/353737a0 · Cited by 28,599
TiO2 photocatalysis: Design and applications
Nakata, K., & Fujishima, A. (2012) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2012.06.001 · Cited by 3,651
Explaining the Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Degussa P25 Mixed-Phase TiO 2 Using EPR
Hurum, D. C., Agrios, A. G., Gray, K. A., Rajh, T., & Thurnauer, M. C. (2003) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp0273934 · Cited by 2,015
Cited by
Metal–support interactions in metal oxide-supported atomic, cluster, and nanoparticle catalysis
Leybo, D., Etim, U. J., Monai, M., Bare, S. R., Zhong, Z., & Vogt, C. (2024) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d4cs00527a · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, J., Kampermann, L., Mockenhaupt, B., Behrens, M., Strunk, J., & Bacher, G.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-09-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 47
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W4386418779
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 45.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Limitations of the Tauc Plot Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.202304523
- The paper
- Klein, J., Kampermann, L., Mockenhaupt, B., Behrens, M., Strunk, J., & Bacher, G. (2023). Limitations of the Tauc Plot Method. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202304523
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.