Controlling Major Cellular Processes of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells using Microwell Structures
Abstract
Directing stem cells towards a desired location and function by utilizing the structural cues of biomaterials is a promising approach for inducing effective tissue regeneration. Here, the cellular response of human adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (hADSCs) to structural signals from microstructured substrates comprising arrays of square‐shaped or round‐shaped microwells is explored as a transitional model between 2D and 3D systems. Microwells with a side length/diameter of 50 μm show advantages over 10 μm and 25 μm microwells for accommodating hADSCs within single microwells rather than in the inter‐microwell area. The cell morphologies are three‐dimensionally modulated by the microwell structure due to differences in focal adhesion and consequent alterations of the cytoskeleton. In contrast to the substrate with 50 μm round‐shaped microwells, the substrate with 50 μm square‐shaped microwells promotes the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation potential of hADSCs but reduces the cell migration velocity and distance. Such microwell shape‐dependent modulatory effects are highly associated with Rho/ROCK signaling. Following ROCK inhibition, the differences in migration, proliferation, and osteogenesis between cells on different substrates are diminished. These results highlight the possibility to control stem cell functions through the use of structured microwells combined with the manipulation of Rho/ROCK signaling.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spheroid cell culture has been developed for research on cancer, stem cells, and many organs, including liver, kidney, and heart.
“This approach has been developed in the research of cancer (7, 76, 102), stem cells (17, 120), and many organs (such as liver, kidney, heart, etc.) (3,16,64,75).”
From Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture (2017) · cites this paper as [120]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Xu, X., Wang, W., Kratz, K., Fang, L., Li, Z., Kurtz, A., Ma, N., & Lendlein, A.
- Affiliations
- Berlin-Brandenburger Centrum für Regenerative Therapien (DE)
- Berlin‐Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies Charité – University Medicine Berlin Augustenburger Platz 1 13353 Berlin Germany
- Corresponding author
- Ma, Nan
- Lendlein, Andreas
- Venue
- Advanced Healthcare Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-14
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1991-2003
- ISSN
- 2192-2640 (ISSN-L)
- 2192-2659
- OpenAlex
- W2091002262
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advanced Healthcare Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Keywords
- human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells, microwells, microstructured substrates, structural cues, focal adhesions, cytoskeleton, cell morphology, cell proliferation, osteogenic differentiation, cell migration, Rho/ROCK signaling, ROCK inhibition, tissue regeneration
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Biocompatible Materials, Cell Physiological Phenomena, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Cell Culture Techniques, Vitronectin, rho-Associated Kinases, Mesenchymal Stem Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review