Freeze‐Casted Keratin Matrix as an Organic Binder to Integrate Hydroxyapatite and BMP2 for Enhanced Cranial Bone Regeneration
Abstract
An ideal bone regenerative scaffold is expected to possess architectural characteristics that mimic the bone tissue, osteoconductive properties, and osteoinductive functionality. Key challenges to creating a scaffold with these ideal characteristics simultaneously are the selection of appropriate processing methods and biocompatible materials. Herein, human hair keratin is proposed as an organic binder for the simultaneous incorporation of bone's major inorganic component, hydroxyapatite and bone's growth factor, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP2) to enable both osteoconductive and osteoinductive characteristics in the creation of bone scaffolds. Furthermore, a freeze‐casting method is selected to fabricate this rhBMP2‐incorporated keratin/hydroxyapatite (KHA) scaffold with aligned lamellar pores to guide and promote bone regeneration. The aligned KHA scaffolds display better mechanical properties, sustained rhBMP2 release, good cell compliance, and 3D cellular infiltration. Implantation of KHA scaffolds in vivo reveals that scaffolds with aligned pores effectively accelerate the healing process of bone defects compared to scaffolds with random pores. This work indicates the distinctive potential of freeze‐casted rhBMP‐2 incorporated KHA scaffolds for bone regeneration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Methods of freeze-drying can impact pore structure of keratin scaffolds, leading to improved healing in a cranial rat defect model.
“Others have recently shown that the methods of freeze-drying can be used to impact pore structure of keratin scaffolds that led to improved healing in a cranial rat defect model [44].”
From Keratin Scaffold Formulation Impacts rhBMP-2 Biodistribution and Bone Regeneration in a Rat Femur Defect Model (2025) · cites this paper as [44]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Sow, W. T., Wang, Y., Chen, L., Lai, Q., Chen, Q., Chen, L., Zhang, C., & Li, H.
- Affiliations
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
- Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Huaqiong
- Venue
- Advanced Healthcare Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-12-21
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- e2201886-e2201886
- ISSN
- 2192-2640 (ISSN-L)
- 2192-2659
- OpenAlex
- W4311033426
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advanced Healthcare Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (WIUCASQD2019002)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Keywords
- keratin, hydroxyapatite, BMP-2, freeze casting, bone regeneration, bone scaffolds, osteoconduction, osteoinduction, hair keratin, sustained growth factor release, bone defects, mechanical properties, cell infiltration
- MeSH terms
- Bone Regeneration, Humans, Keratins, Osteogenesis, Skull, Durapatite, Tissue Scaffolds, Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review