Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Natural MOF‐Like Photocatalytic Nanozymes Alleviate Tumor Pressure for Enhanced Nanodrug Penetration

Li, Anshuo, Li, Yifei, Jia, Yanmin, He, Yuchu, Yuan, Meng, Hao, Zining, He, Yaqian, Fu, Yihan, Zhang, Jinhui, Gao, Dawei, Zhang, Xuwu, Jiang, Xinquan, Tu, Wenkang·2025·Advanced Healthcare Materials

Abstract

In oncological nanomedicine, overcoming the dual‐phase high interstitial pressure in the tumor microenvironment is pivotal for enhancing the penetration and efficacy of nanotherapeutics. The elevated tumor interstitial solid pressure (TISP) is largely attributed to the overaccumulation of collagen in the extracellular matrix, while the increased tumor interstitial fluid pressure (TIFP) stems from the accumulation of fluid due to the aberrant vascular architecture. In this context, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) with catalytic efficiency have shown potential in degrading tumor interstitial components, thereby reducing interstitial pressure. However, the potential biotoxicity of the organic components of MOFs limits their clinical translation. To circumvent this, a MOF‐like photocatalytic nanozyme, RPC@M, using naturally derived cobalt phytate (CoPA) and resveratrol (Res) is developed. This nanozyme not only facilitates the decomposition of water in the tumor interstitium under photoactivation to reduce TIFP, but also generates an abundance of reactive oxygen species through its peroxidase‐like activity to exert cytotoxic effects on tumor cells. Moreover, Res contributes to the reduction of collagen deposition, thereby lowering TISP. The concurrent diminution of both TISP and TIFP by RPC@M leads to enhanced tumor penetration and potent antitumor activity, presenting an innovative approach in constructing tumor therapeutic nanozymes from natural products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adhm.202400596

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1016/j.addr.2021.02.019 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.05.043 · DOI
  3. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4521 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/adma.201900192 · DOI
  5. 10.1021/acsnano.1c03048 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/anie.202200480 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121816 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/EXP.20210005 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/adhm.202300191 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s40820-022-00848-y · DOI
  11. 10.1002/adfm.202210850 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100537 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122345 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/adma.202006042 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/adfm.202308589 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/aenm.202100154 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/btm2.10143 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.074 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/10717544.2022.2094498 · DOI
  20. 10.1039/C6TA05322J · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118367 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155405 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.08.108 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.08.188 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113775 · DOI
  26. 10.1142/S0192415X23500313 · DOI
  27. 10.1265/ehpm.23-00020 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/adma.202301257 · DOI
  29. 10.3390/biomedicines8080261 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/ptr.7608 · DOI
  31. 10.1021/ed084p685 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163297 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105413 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s41467-019-11269-8 · DOI
  35. 10.1186/s40824-023-00464-w · DOI
  36. 10.1002/adma.202104729 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212935 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, A., Li, Y., Jia, Y., He, Y., Yuan, M., Hao, Z., He, Y., Fu, Y., Zhang, J., Gao, D., Zhang, X., Jiang, X., & Tu, W.
Venue
Advanced Healthcare Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-06-27
Volume
14
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 2192-2640
  • 2192-2659
Cited by
14
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (H2020107010)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A20309, 22078280, 22108235, 22208282, 22278349)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review