Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,639

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficient two layer leds on a polymer blend basis

Pommerehne, Jörn, Vestweber, Horst, Guss, Werner, Mahrt, Rainer F., Bässler, Heinz, Porsch, Michael, Daub, Jörg·1995·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Polymer blends in organic LEDs offer the advantage of processibility coupled with flexibility with respect to the chromophores which can be incorporated into their structures. The polymer matrix is also though to have a positive effect on the quantum efficiency and other LED performance indicators. Two‐layer devices have also been shown recently to yield improved performances. Here, a two‐layer device based on polymer blends is reported.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.19950070608

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Pommerehne, J., Vestweber, H., Guss, W., Mahrt, R. F., Bässler, H., Porsch, M., & Daub, J.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-06
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
551-554
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W1993940760
Cited by
1,639
References
0
FWCI
26.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.