Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 589

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Measuring the Efficiency of Organic Light‐Emitting Devices

Forrest, S.R., Bradley, D.D.C., Thompson, M.E.·2003·Advanced Materials

Abstract

As organic light‐emitting devices emerge from the stage of being a research curiosity to that of becoming a practical appliance with important commercial applications, the need for a coherent and accurate standard technique for measuring device efficiencies becomes increasingly important. By following the methods described in this contribution, measurements made in disparate laboratories testing a wide range of materials and device structures should agree, to within small experimental errors, on the properties of the subject devices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.200302151

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 589

Metadata

Authors
Forrest, S. R., Bradley, D. D. C., & Thompson, M. E.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06-30
Volume
15
Issue
13
Pages
1043-1048
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2121480225
Cited by
589
References
0
FWCI
19.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring the Efficiency of Organic Light‐Emitting Devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.200302151
The paper
Forrest, S. R., Bradley, D. D. C., & Thompson, M. E. (2003). Measuring the Efficiency of Organic Light‐Emitting Devices. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200302151

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.