Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 574

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Carbon Nanocages as Supercapacitor Electrode Materials

Xie, Ke, Qin, Xingtai, Wang, Xizhang, Wang, Yangnian, Tao, Haisheng, Wu, Qiang, Yang, Lijun, Hu, Zheng·2012·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Supercapacitor electrode materials: Carbon nanocages are conveniently produced by an in situ MgO template method and demonstrate high specific capacitance over a wide range of charging-discharging rates with high stability, superior to the most carbonaceous supercapacitor electrode materials to date. The large specific surface area, good mesoporosity, and regular structure are responsible for the excellent performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201103872

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 574

Metadata

Authors
Xie, K., Qin, X., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Tao, H., Wu, Q., Yang, L., & Hu, Z.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-05
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
347-352
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2003563364
Cited by
574
References
0
FWCI
13.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon Nanocages as Supercapacitor Electrode Materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201103872
The paper
Xie, K., Qin, X., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Tao, H., Wu, Q., Yang, L., & Hu, Z. (2012). Carbon Nanocages as Supercapacitor Electrode Materials. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201103872

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.