The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sodium‐Oxygen Batteries: A Comparative Review from Chemical and Electrochemical Fundamentals to Future Perspective
Abstract
Alkali metal‐oxygen (Li‐O 2, Na‐O 2) batteries have attracted a great deal of attention recently due to their high theoretical energy densities, comparable to gasoline, making them attractive candidates for application in electrical vehicles. However, the limited cycling life and low energy efficiency (high charging overpotential) of these cells hinder their commercialization. The Li‐O 2 battery system has been extensively studied in this regard during the past decade. Compared to the numerous reports of Li‐O 2 batteries, the research on Na‐O 2 batteries is still in its infancy. Although, Na‐O 2 batteries show a number of attractive properties such as low charging overpotential and high round‐trip energy efficiency, their cycling life is currently limited to a few tens of cycles. Therefore, understanding the chemistry behind Na‐O 2 cells is critical towards enhancing their performance and advancing their development. Chemical and electrochemical reactions of Na‐O 2 batteries are reviewed and compared with those of Li‐O 2 batteries in the present review, as well as recent works on the chemical composition and morphology of the discharge products in these batteries. Furthermore, the determining kinetics factors for controlling the chemical composition of the discharge products in Na‐O 2 cells are discussed and the potential research directions toward improving Na‐O 2 cells are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pearson, R. G. (1963) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00905a001 · Cited by 10,475
Cited by
Metal–Air Batteries: Will They Be the Future Electrochemical Energy Storage Device of Choice?
Li, Y., & Lu, J. (2017) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00119 · Cited by 990
Yang, J., Ju, Z., Jiang, Y., Xing, Z., Xi, B., Feng, J., & Xiong, S. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201700104 · Cited by 849
Recent developments and insights into the understanding of Na metal anodes for Na-metal batteries
Zhao, Y., Adair, K. R., & Sun, X. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee01373j · Cited by 533
Self-citationHuang, J., Wu, K., Xu, G., Wu, M., Dou, S., & Wu, C. (2023) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs01029a · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Yadegari, H., Sun, Q., & Sun, X.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-06-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 7065-7093
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2418923412
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sodium‐Oxygen Batteries: A Comparative Review from Chemical and Electrochemical Fundamentals to Future Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201504373
- The paper
- Yadegari, H., Sun, Q., & Sun, X. (2016). Sodium‐Oxygen Batteries: A Comparative Review from Chemical and Electrochemical Fundamentals to Future Perspective. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201504373
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.