The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Confined Amorphous Red Phosphorus in MOF‐Derived N‐Doped Microporous Carbon as a Superior Anode for Sodium‐Ion Battery
Abstract
Red phosphorus (P) has attracted intense attention as promising anode material for high‐energy density sodium‐ion batteries (NIBs), owing to its high sodium storage theoretical capacity (2595 mAh g−1). Nevertheless, natural insulating property and large volume variation of red P during cycling result in extremely low electrochemical activity, leading to poor electrochemical performance. Herein, the authors demonstrate a rational strategy to improve sodium storage performance of red P by confining nanosized amorphous red P into zeolitic imidazolate framework‐8 (ZIF‐8) ‐derived nitrogen‐doped microporous carbon matrix (denoted as P@N‐MPC). When used as anode for NIBs, the P@N‐MPC composite displays a high reversible specific capacity of ≈600 mAh g−1 at 0.15 A g−1 and improved rate capacity (≈450 mAh g−1 at 1 A g−1 after 1000 cycles with an extremely low capacity fading rate of 0.02% per cycle). The superior sodium storage performance of the P@N‐MPC is mainly attributed to the novel structure. The N‐doped porous carbon with sub‐1 nm micropore facilitates the rapid diffusion of organic electrolyte ions and improves the conductivity of the encapsulated red P. Furthermore, the porous carbon matrix can buffer the volume change of red P during repeat sodiation/desodiation process, keeping the structure intact after long cycle life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Cited by
A cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries
Vaalma, C., Buchholz, D., Weil, M., & Passerini, S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2018.13 · Cited by 2,613
Rechargeable Batteries for Grid Scale Energy Storage
Zhu, Z., Jiang, T., Ali, M., Meng, Y., Jin, Y., Cui, Y., & Chen, W. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00289 · Cited by 1,769
Metal–organic frameworks as a platform for clean energy applications
Li, X., Yang, X., Xue, H., Pang, H., & Xu, Q. (2020) · EnergyChem · doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2020.100027 · Cited by 706
Applications of Phosphorene and Black Phosphorus in Energy Conversion and Storage Devices
Pang, J., Bachmatiuk, A., Yin, Y., Trzebicka, B., Zhao, L., Fu, L., Mendes, R. G., Gemming, T., Liu, Z., & Rummeli, M. H. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201702093 · Cited by 518
Sun, Y., Guo, S., & Zhou, H. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee01006d · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, W., Hu, S., Luo, X., Li, Z., Sun, X., Li, M., Liu, F., & Yu, Y.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02-22
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 16
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2591118683
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Confined Amorphous Red Phosphorus in MOF‐Derived N‐Doped Microporous Carbon as a Superior Anode for Sodium‐Ion Battery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201605820
- The paper
- Li, W., Hu, S., Luo, X., Li, Z., Sun, X., Li, M., Liu, F., & Yu, Y. (2017). Confined Amorphous Red Phosphorus in MOF‐Derived N‐Doped Microporous Carbon as a Superior Anode for Sodium‐Ion Battery. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201605820
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.