Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultrahigh and Selective SO2 Uptake in Inorganic Anion‐Pillared Hybrid Porous Materials

Cui, Xili, Yang, Qiwei, Yang, Lifeng, Krishna, Rajamani, Zhang, Zhiguo, Bao, Zongbi, Wu, Hui, Ren, Qilong, Zhou, Wei, Chen, Banglin, Xing, Huabin·2017·Advanced Materials

Abstract

The efficient capture of SO 2 is of great significance in gas‐purification processes including flue‐gas desulfurization and natural‐gas purification, but the design of porous materials with high adsorption capacity and selectivity of SO 2 remains very challenging. Herein, the selective recognition and dense packing of SO 2 clusters through multiple synergistic host–guest and guest–guest interactions by controlling the pore chemistry and size in inorganic anion (SiF 62−, SIFSIX) pillared metal–organic frameworks is reported. The binding sites of anions and aromatic rings in SIFSIX materials grasp every atom of SO 2 firmly via S δ+···F δ− electrostatic interactions and O δ−···H δ+ dipole–dipole interactions, while the guest–guest interactions between SO 2 molecules further promote gas trapping within the pore space, which is elucidated by first‐principles density functional theory calculations and powder X‐ray diffraction experiments. These interactions afford new benchmarks for the highly efficient removal of SO 2 from other gases, even if at a very low SO 2 concentration. Exceptionally high SO 2 capacity of 11.01 mmol g−1 is achieved at atmosphere pressure by SIFSIX‐1‐Cu, and unprecedented low‐pressure SO 2 capacity is obtained in SIFSIX‐2‐Cu‐i (4.16 mmol g−1 SO 2 at 0.01 bar and 2.31 mmol g−1 at 0.002 bar). More importantly, record SO 2/CO 2 selectivity (86–89) and excellent SO 2/N 2 selectivity (1285–3145) are also achieved. Experimental breakthrough curves further demonstrate the excellent performance of these hybrid porous materials in removing low‐concentration SO 2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201606929

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Cui, X., Yang, Q., Yang, L., Krishna, R., Zhang, Z., Bao, Z., Wu, H., Ren, Q., Zhou, W., Chen, B., & Xing, H.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-31
Volume
29
Issue
28
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2617584577
Cited by
261
References
1
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrahigh and Selective SO2 Uptake in Inorganic Anion‐Pillared Hybrid Porous Materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201606929
The paper
Cui, X., Yang, Q., Yang, L., Krishna, R., Zhang, Z., Bao, Z., Wu, H., Ren, Q., Zhou, W., Chen, B., & Xing, H. (2017). Ultrahigh and Selective SO2 Uptake in Inorganic Anion‐Pillared Hybrid Porous Materials. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201606929

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.