Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 699

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Single‐Junction Binary‐Blend Nonfullerene Polymer Solar Cells with 12.1% Efficiency

Open access
Zhao, Fuwen, Dai, Shuixing, Wu, Yang, Zhang, Qianqian, Wang, Jiayu, Jiang, Li, Ling, Qidan, Wei, Zhixiang, Ma, Wei, You, Wei, Wang, Chunru, Zhan, Xiaowei·2017·Advanced Materials

Abstract

A new fluorinated nonfullerene acceptor, ITIC‐Th1, has been designed and synthesized by introducing fluorine (F) atoms onto the end‐capping group 1,1‐dicyanomethylene‐3‐indanone (IC). On the one hand, incorporation of F would improve intramolecular interaction, enhance the push–pull effect between the donor unit indacenodithieno[3,2‐b]thiophene and the acceptor unit IC due to electron‐withdrawing effect of F, and finally adjust energy levels and reduce bandgap, which is beneficial to light harvesting and enhancing short‐circuit current density (JSC). On the other hand, incorporation of F would improve intermolecular interactions through CF···S, CF···H, and CF···π noncovalent interactions and enhance electron mobility, which is beneficial to enhancing JSC and fill factor. Indeed, the results show that fluorinated ITIC‐Th1 exhibits redshifted absorption, smaller optical bandgap, and higher electron mobility than the nonfluorinated ITIC‐Th. Furthermore, nonfullerene organic solar cells (OSCs) based on fluorinated ITIC‐Th1 electron acceptor and a wide‐bandgap polymer donor FTAZ based on benzodithiophene and benzotriazole exhibit power conversion efficiency (PCE) as high as 12.1%, significantly higher than that of nonfluorinated ITIC‐Th (8.88%). The PCE of 12.1% is the highest in fullerene and nonfullerene‐based single‐junction binary‐blend OSCs. Moreover, the OSCs based on FTAZ:ITIC‐Th1 show much better efficiency and better stability than the control devices based on FTAZ:PC 71 BM (PCE = 5.22%).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201700144

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

See all 699

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, F., Dai, S., Wu, Y., Zhang, Q., Wang, J., Jiang, L., Ling, Q., Wei, Z., Ma, W., You, W., Wang, C., & Zhan, X.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-10
Volume
29
Issue
18
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2591826571
Cited by
699
References
57
FWCI
62.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Single‐Junction Binary‐Blend Nonfullerene Polymer Solar Cells with 12.1% Efficiency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201700144
The paper
Zhao, F., Dai, S., Wu, Y., Zhang, Q., Wang, J., Jiang, L., Ling, Q., Wei, Z., Ma, W., You, W., Wang, C., & Zhan, X. (2017). Single‐Junction Binary‐Blend Nonfullerene Polymer Solar Cells with 12.1% Efficiency. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201700144

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.