Graphene in the design and engineering of next‐generation neural interfaces
Open accessAbstract
Neural interfaces are becoming a powerful toolkit for clinical interventions requiring stimulation and/or recording of the electrical activity of the nervous system. Active implantable devices offer a promising approach for the treatment of various diseases affecting the central or peripheral nervous systems by electrically stimulating different neuronal structures. All currently used neural interface devices are designed to perform a single function: either record activity or electrically stimulate tissue. Because of their electrical and electrochemical performance and their suitability for integration into flexible devices, graphene-based materials constitute a versatile platform that could help address many of the current challenges in neural interface design. Here, how graphene and other 2D materials possess an array of properties that can enable enhanced functional capabilities for neural interfaces is illustrated. It is emphasized that the technological challenges are similar for all alternative types of materials used in the engineering of neural interface devices, each offering a unique set of advantages and limitations. Graphene and 2D materials can indeed play a commanding role in the efforts toward wider clinical adoption of bioelectronics and electroceuticals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Graphene-based materials emerge in neural interfaces, given their outstanding electrical and optical properties.
“Among carbon-based materials, graphene-based materials emerge in neural interfaces, given their outstanding electrical and optical properties [171].”
From Advances in visual prostheses: engineering and biological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [171]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 206
- Authors
- Kostarelos, K., Vincent, M., Hebert, C., & Garrido, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2) CSIC and The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology Campus UAB Bellaterra 08193 Barcelona Spain
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Kostarelos, Kostas
- Garrido, Jose A.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-09-13
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 42
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2755584164
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ddd.uab.cat
- Licence
- public-domain
- onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
- Locations
- Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (696656)
- Spanish MINECO (SEV-2013-0295)
- P-SPHERE COFUND - Horizon 2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
- Keywords
- graphene, two-dimensional materials, neural interfaces, neurostimulation, neural recording, bioelectronics, electroceuticals, flexible electronics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review