Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 410

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Ideal Molecular Sieve for Acetylene Removal from Ethylene with Record Selectivity and Productivity

Open access
Li, Bin, Cui, Xili, O'Nolan, Daniel, Wen, Hui‐Min, Jiang, Mengdie, Krishna, Rajamani, Wu, Hui, Lin, Rui‐Biao, Chen, Yu‐Sheng, Yuan, Daqiang, Xing, Huabin, Zhou, Wei, Ren, Qilong, Qian, Guodong, Zaworotko, Michael J., Chen, Banglin·2017·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Realization of ideal molecular sieves, in which the larger gas molecules are completely blocked without sacrificing high adsorption capacities of the preferred smaller gas molecules, can significantly reduce energy costs for gas separation and purification and thus facilitate a possible technological transformation from the traditional energy‐intensive cryogenic distillation to the energy‐efficient, adsorbent‐based separation and purification in the future. Although extensive research endeavors are pursued to target ideal molecular sieves among diverse porous materials, over the past several decades, ideal molecular sieves for the separation and purification of light hydrocarbons are rarely realized. Herein, an ideal porous material, SIFSIX‐14‐Cu‐i (also termed as UTSA‐200), is reported with ultrafine tuning of pore size (3.4 Å) to effectively block ethylene (C 2 H 4) molecules but to take up a record‐high amount of acetylene (C 2 H 2, 58 cm 3 cm−3 under 0.01 bar and 298 K). The material therefore sets up new benchmarks for both the adsorption capacity and selectivity, and thus provides a record purification capacity for the removal of trace C 2 H 2 from C 2 H 4 with 1.18 mmol g−1 C 2 H 2 uptake capacity from a 1/99 C 2 H 2/C 2 H 4 mixture to produce 99.9999% pure C 2 H 4 (much higher than the acceptable purity of 99.996% for polymer‐grade C 2 H 4), as demonstrated by experimental breakthrough curves.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201704210

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 410

Metadata

Authors
Li, B., Cui, X., O'Nolan, D., Wen, H., Jiang, M., Krishna, R., Wu, H., Lin, R., Chen, Y., Yuan, D., Xing, H., Zhou, W., Ren, Q., Qian, G., Zaworotko, M. J., & Chen, B.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-10
Volume
29
Issue
47
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2768020335
Cited by
410
References
3
FWCI
13.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Ideal Molecular Sieve for Acetylene Removal from Ethylene with Record Selectivity and Productivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201704210
The paper
Li, B., Cui, X., O'Nolan, D., Wen, H., Jiang, M., Krishna, R., Wu, H., Lin, R., Chen, Y., Yuan, D., Xing, H., Zhou, W., Ren, Q., Qian, G., Zaworotko, M. J., & Chen, B. (2017). An Ideal Molecular Sieve for Acetylene Removal from Ethylene with Record Selectivity and Productivity. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201704210

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.