The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Covalent Organic Frameworks as a Decorating Platform for Utilization and Affinity Enhancement of Chelating Sites for Radionuclide Sequestration
Open accessAbstract
The potential consequences of nuclear events and the complexity of nuclear waste management motivate the development of selective solid‐phase sorbents to provide enhanced protection. Herein, it is shown that 2D covalent organic frameworks (COFs) with unique structures possess all the traits to be well suited as a platform for the deployment of highly efficient sorbents such that they exhibit remarkable performance, as demonstrated by uranium capture. The chelating groups laced on the open 1D channels exhibit exceptional accessibility, allowing significantly higher utilization efficiency. In addition, the 2D extended polygons packed closely in an eclipsed fashion bring chelating groups in adjacent layers parallel to each other, which may facilitate their cooperation, thereby leading to high affinity toward specific ions. As a result, the amidoxime‐functionalized COFs far outperform their corresponding amorphous analogs in terms of adsorption capacities, kinetics, and affinities. Specifically, COF‐TpAb‐AO is able to reduce various uranium contaminated water samples from 1 ppm to less than 0.1 ppb within several minutes, well below the drinking water limit (30 ppb), as well as mine uranium from spiked seawater with an exceptionally high uptake capacity of 127 mg g−1. These results delineate important synthetic advances toward the implementation of COFs in environmental remediation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Porous, Crystalline, Covalent Organic Frameworks
Côté, A. P., Benin, A. I., Ockwig, N. W., O'Keeffe, M., Matzger, A. J., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1120411 · Cited by 8,357
Seven chemical separations to change the world
Sholl, D. S., & Lively, R. P. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/532435a · Cited by 4,769
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs): from design to applications
Ding, S.-Y., & Wang, W. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35072f · Cited by 4,020
Feng, X., Ding, X., & Jiang, D. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35157a · Cited by 3,098
Covalent organic frameworks comprising cobalt porphyrins for catalytic CO 2 reduction in water
Lin, S., Diercks, C. S., Zhang, Y.-B., Kornienko, N., Nichols, E. M., Zhao, Y., Paris, A. R., Kim, D., Yang, P., Yaghi, O. M., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac8343 · Cited by 2,644
Ding, S.-Y., Gao, J., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Song, W.-G., Su, C.-Y., & Wang, W. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja206846p · Cited by 2,443
Kandambeth, S., Mallick, A., Lukose, B., Mane, M. V., Heine, T., & Banerjee, R. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja308278w · Cited by 2,156
Function-led design of new porous materials
Slater, A. G., & Cooper, A. I. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8075 · Cited by 1,663
Stable, crystalline, porous, covalent organic frameworks as a platform for chiral organocatalysts
Xu, H., Gao, J., & Jiang, D. (2015) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2352 · Cited by 1,643
Porous Organic Materials: Strategic Design and Structure–Function Correlation
Das, S., Heasman, P., Ben, T., & Qiu, S. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00439 · Cited by 1,286
Cited by
Liu, R., Tan, K. T., Gong, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Z., Xie, S., He, T., Lu, Z., Yang, H., & Jiang, D. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00620c · Cited by 1,083
Nonporous Adaptive Crystals of Pillararenes
Jie, K., Zhou, Y., Li, E., & Huang, F. (2018) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00255 · Cited by 533
Magnetic metal–organic framework composites for environmental monitoring and remediation
Meteku, B. E., Huang, J., Zeng, J., Subhan, F., Feng, F., Zhang, Y., Qiu, Z., Aslam, S., Li, G., & Yan, Z. (2020) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213261 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, Q., Aguila, B., Earl, L. D., Abney, C. W., Wojtas, L., Thallapally, P. K., & Ma, S.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-03-27
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- e1705479-e1705479
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2795339847
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 24.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Covalent Organic Frameworks as a Decorating Platform for Utilization and Affinity Enhancement of Chelating Sites for Radionuclide Sequestration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201705479
- The paper
- Sun, Q., Aguila, B., Earl, L. D., Abney, C. W., Wojtas, L., Thallapally, P. K., & Ma, S. (2018). Covalent Organic Frameworks as a Decorating Platform for Utilization and Affinity Enhancement of Chelating Sites for Radionuclide Sequestration. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201705479
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
