Cited by 260CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

2D Metal Oxyhalide‐Derived Catalysts for Efficient CO2 Electroreduction

García de Arquer, F. Pelayo, Bushuyev, Oleksandr S., De Luna, Phil, Dinh, Cao‐Thang, Seifitokaldani, Ali, Saidaminov, Makhsud I., Tan, Chih‐Shan, Quan, Li Na +5 more·2018·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Electrochemical reduction of CO 2 is a compelling route to store renewable electricity in the form of carbon‐based fuels. Efficient electrochemical reduction of CO 2 requires catalysts that combine high activity, high selectivity, and low overpotential. Extensive surface reconstruction of metal catalysts under high productivity operating conditions (high current densities, reducing potentials, and variable pH) renders the realization of tailored catalysts that maximize the exposure of the most favorable facets, the number of active sites, and the oxidation state all the more challenging. Earth‐abundant transition metals such as tin, bismuth, and lead have been proven stable and product‐specific, but exhibit limited partial current densities. Here, a strategy that employs bismuth oxyhalides as a template from which 2D bismuth‐based catalysts are derived is reported. The BiOBr‐templated catalyst exhibits a preferential exposure of highly active Bi () facets. Thereby, the CO 2 reduction reaction selectivity is increased to over 90% Faradaic efficiency and simultaneously stable current densities of up to 200 mA cm−2 are achieved—more than a twofold increase in the production of the energy‐storage liquid formic acid compared to previous best Bi catalysts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201802858

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 260

Authors
García de Arquer, F. P., Bushuyev, O. S., De Luna, P., Dinh, C., Seifitokaldani, A., Saidaminov, M. I., Tan, C., Quan, L. N., Proppe, A., Kibria, M. G., Kelley, S. O., Sinton, D., & Sargent, E. H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto 35 St. George Street Toronto ON M5S 1A4 Canada
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Department of Materials Science Engineering University of Toronto 27 King's College Circle Toronto ON M5S 1A1 Canada
Corresponding author
Sargent, Edward H.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-08
Volume
30
Issue
38
Pages
e1802858-e1802858
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2885627064
Cited by
260
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Ontario Research Foundation (ORF‐RE‐08‐034)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Canadian Light Source
  • Ontario Centres of Excellence
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Keywords
electrochemical CO2 reduction, bismuth oxyhalides, facet exposure, formate production, Faradaic efficiency, surface reconstruction, earth-abundant transition metals, electrocatalyst stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review