Selectively Potentiating Hypoxia Levels by Combretastatin A4 Nanomedicine: Toward Highly Enhanced Hypoxia‐Activated Prodrug Tirapazamine Therapy for Metastatic Tumors
Abstract
Hypoxia‐activated prodrugs (HAPs) have the potential to selectively kill hypoxic cells and convert tumor hypoxia from a problem to a selective treatment advantage. However, HAPs are unsuccessful in most clinical trials owing to inadequate hypoxia within the treated tumors, as implied by a further substudy of a phase II clinical trial. Here, a novel strategy for the combination of HAPs plus vascular disrupting agent (VDA) nanomedicine for efficacious solid tumor therapy is developed. An effective VDA nanomedicine of poly(l‐glutamic acid)‐graft‐methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)/combretastatin A4 (CA4‐NPs) is prepared and can selectively enhance tumor hypoxia and boost a typical HAP tirapazamine (TPZ) therapy against metastatic 4T1 breast tumors. After treatment with the combination of TPZ plus CA4‐NPs, complete tumor reduction is observed in 4T1 xenograft mice (initial tumor volume is 180 mm 3), and significant tumor shrinkage and antimetastatic effects are observed in challenging large tumors with initial volume of 500 mm 3. The report here highlights the potential of using a combination of HAPs plus VDA nanomedicine in solid tumor therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HAPs combined with VDA nanomaterials selectively enhanced tumor hypoxia and TPZ in the treatment of metastatic 4T1 breast tumors.
“This approach selectively enhanced tumor hypoxia and TPZ in the treatment of metastatic 4T1 breast tumors.”
From Hypoxia signaling in cancer: Implications for therapeutic interventions (2023) · cites this paper as [171]
HAPs have been used in combination with vascular-disrupting agent (VDA) nanomaterials for the effective treatment of solid tumors.
“For example, HAPs have been used in combination with vascular‐disrupting agent (VDA) nanomaterials for the effective treatment of solid tumors.”
From Hypoxia signaling in cancer: Implications for therapeutic interventions (2023) · cites this paper as [171]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 210
- Authors
- Yang, S., Tang, Z., Hu, C., Zhang, D., Shen, N., Yu, H., & Chen, X.
- Affiliations
- Jilin University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Tang, Zhaohui
- Chen, Xuesi
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01-24
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e1805955-e1805955
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2914293180
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 21
- FWCI
- 9.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2016YFC1100701, 2018ZX09711003‐012)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
- Keywords
- hypoxia-activated prodrug, tirapazamine, combretastatin A-4, vascular disrupting agents, nanomedicine, tumor hypoxia, metastatic breast cancer, combination cancer therapy, antimetastatic effect
- MeSH terms
- Tumor Hypoxia, Tirapazamine, Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Drug Synergism, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Neoplasm Metastasis, Prodrugs, Stilbenes, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Nanomedicine, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review